From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com (mail-pl1-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAEEE3ED3A9 for ; Wed, 20 May 2026 14:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779288249; cv=none; b=bS/dJ2tsSKG9R5binKBtiHSh4TdFTkQpFXwLpKPBbCgBsJgSc1N+lIQrIOPxdFQGFDRpBhUsJ8NKsPXdJRIxLS2YmaW3aE7hD4YpLGpnexajCWe0FKBRjfYqKLKUFRLD1wMhYB0ld2CBCxBZp8D9qtS4SyYdUZU+mlkgUr7fZIQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779288249; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IbqBppi3UPCAVDBr8Wdzbg0LS9uMUthSSk6144XtZEs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UJpvGEssK44d2idqhSSY78lYNRwHW/mbugBE+qwEN/25TUlC9dc/DLOnifMXOaVzhkZpM4mnymGlBPJ3rVwpBhMCI0hwLZPztNXv7rVE1kXW2FiNELaPejmv1K0ecQmUt4+DDl6rJcVdXbqbXeyopL9lwWae1Pv+kGjiN9Oehvc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=gtN9PaOh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="gtN9PaOh" Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b2e8b95bdbso1175ad.0 for ; Wed, 20 May 2026 07:44:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1779288247; x=1779893047; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Xa0g4SHC40+ZGcmvS1PxCiS4poMC/f+w9xSnfF9PXt4=; b=gtN9PaOhTpCLGhGIxkFV2h9aIHBHCyQg8NjGa++erWFWRkLgSNvgZWCk/8GN6uGjKM FHpNRPipY7Pyfe29yMLKWuIKMqXVu3Bhqx1r2K+tWlWlpDaFX/RK91FEDfwRU2EcelFN hx9Y63NKLAnpcS534oxYvroW8IYjmhbaL9nP0DFVAL3SK2FCZFl7KHhP4gpWmA4J89uy B4tOqWaLnr4lL3UEanmkjdQkGtIWGpLHPx1bsoHb+Ph1Ulvk4Yj5fAJT+1Xj6kJSfkJB VWiNtzXZmHya4SsQiwTWR4+Ps8hrfry0u2s08lQzjuT03Ancr9081HDigdABNPHlV/6h GwuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1779288247; x=1779893047; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Xa0g4SHC40+ZGcmvS1PxCiS4poMC/f+w9xSnfF9PXt4=; b=WRVt/otUSPt2jbgKtm4Mr2DkRzhagnrzzCdfXvkziXk62RP1ItugkSBGFTYP5YcDUj 2AFsw92iVceM9ROSipWVXUkXKoQSvs5/46m5SNHHimf+4fUbF/ZG/bbkWx4Gfp7Rkf3L r4ylXnr1g27GGBVHA3LVIVvJVnR96koIN0rpIJr2FUbpcrV5mmHytANUUQP9tZBUkmOt mMLGDIe7x82xzahwCO0lgAK2jB4rQmyUJwLXyWNNR58f5TZzPCtIaqf/AW3LiJbdaldB 6xN/zqrHQo7v4xBqetOlePT3F4QB92+iQMnFjZCNuSvvW9C2VTuu+mk6LJrDyshtDmAh ZgHQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9SCwIIsY4dnH0tqSzNc5wl+yMeB6IsEaaYUQ5aJHkY7U5m3xS2IlqtaQwK+EoCSaD7TG1k7uBXsjulFPE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwoENkb0ftzVfmHSC1MSiof/9NNPDKJ4nwjGGkCzCePBdfjyMpS 75i14HjxYkwwNUdNNJo49nkZVr+ZGCYuUxSaSKSh1X9Mn9QdXvFUtSrO3m9NiqVkEA== X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OHxsA7ZBTDDGjeUmCM+5mn2SSlNxSL6HRTRCLIWDhs/iup7Ap1BhZDYM+cUxzE U9zKc8ojhYuUGDv9SyWoTBLf7BHm2GmU3j9+GjGdgT16aERAI03l41iZGuSmjIMhmiCdfCDgHpb lmJWcN5l4INdOkOvyiWDztc7vOMDLbbpjVO7DDgYxP/SwfVQ0xm2sdkBaA4I6zvnaUm2wYUCVnl RuLsKKJdn6Hqj5bajxpIbiNkjK0zplxrMTgpsHQrvChTOd4rC3EKL1e6qnyoC4vrOtvXztcuQcn +zW+aBTLmhlGyGW1rJtOdNbJTz2LHcQAyuwpbkcmfr8eq60lfmrmXijDtxEZldkCMVnk7OLrHvS vYmhILVH7JRxKJol/4nNh3MQgo9Z2HsYvGUIwerpoCtrtKqzxs3Kp3mujBac0c7yhVYBTMv2yOZ Iscji3MbUPsABzC77wD8vOn9kSQ2nbxZGv4OhPtU3sO4AhD3zXAXCSu1aIO0GsAKTFa7Cc X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:3904:b0:2a8:ffed:4663 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2bdb03a2a4bmr9928575ad.12.1779288246205; Wed, 20 May 2026 07:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (44.234.124.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.124.234.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2bd5bd5fe51sm221346295ad.2.2026.05.20.07.43.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 May 2026 07:44:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 14:43:53 +0000 From: Pranjal Shrivastava To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Tianrui Zhao , Bibo Mao , Huacai Chen , Madhavan Srinivasan , Nicholas Piggin , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , David Hildenbrand , Vitaly Kuznetsov , David Woodhouse , Paul Durrant , Eric Farman , Matthew Rosato , Halil Pasic , Nipun Gupta , Nikhil Agarwal , Alex Williamson , Ioana Ciornei , Longfang Liu , Julian Ruess , Kirti Wankhede , Yishai Hadas , Ankit Agrawal , Jason Gunthorpe , Shameer Kolothum , Kevin Tian , Brett Creeley , Eric Auger , Mostafa Saleh , Giovanni Cabiddu , David Matlack , =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Winiarski , Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefano Garzarella , Cornelia Huck , Jason Wang , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Kiryl Shutsemau , Dave Hansen , Rick Edgecombe , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Roman Gushchin , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Sashiko review email for kvm@vger.kernel.org? Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 02:34:11PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > +KVM and LKML (to capture as many of these discussions possible) > > On Wed, May 20, 2026, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 12:18:17AM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > Hello people with a MAINTAINERS entry that uses kvm@vger.kernel.org as a mailing list! > > > > > > How would y'all feel about enabling Sashiko[*] emails for kvm@vger.kernel.org? For > > > a variety of reasons, Sashiko currently only logs its reviews to https://sashiko.dev > > > by default. If subsystems want to receive on-list mails, they need to opt-in. > > > > > > I really, really want to enable email reviews for KVM x86, as Sashiko has found > > > an almost embarassing number of bugs that (a) would have been painful to debug > > > had they escaped review and (b) I'm not convinced would have been found by > > > traditional review. And for me at least the signal:noise ratio is more than good > > > enough. There are still hallucinations and false positives from time to time, > > > but the good outweighs the bad by quite a bit, it's cathartic to flame AI when > > > it's wrong, and worst case scenario I can simply ignore Sashiko. > > > > > > But, currently Sashiko is only capable of making decisions based on mailing list, > > > i.e. as things stand, _all_ of kvm@ needs to opt-in. Before I badger Roman to > > > add bespoke logic to Sashiko's email flow, e.g. to special case KVM x86 in some > > > way, I want to see if there's a general consensus in favor (or against) enabling > > > review emails. > > > > I vote for enabling it, it has proven helpful at multiple places. I > > would wanna ratelimit the # emails it may send in case of a malfunction > > though. > > Ya, there's definitely an implied "we'll turn it back off if there are major > problems". But I don't see any reason to treat Sashiko any differently than > other automated systems in this regard; when bots have been too noisy in the > past, we've complained, and the bot/system was "fixed". Yea, fair point. Enable +1 from me. Thanks, Praan