From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD9A5346769 for ; Sun, 10 May 2026 21:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778449420; cv=none; b=LuVmhHDyW7WnSTJR9kX+6sAlnkhien+ql+0ApZSXP+o3tCjDXMlM8DUlJ0WDqnddsSGugYPE1iazRdT8jHs6FMX0uc6Q9oTPimKMaHPevc2jXs4/lY5LkCIm7SSW1g0u/X/bbiRQB+NlGdY7hx1uOa8GJVYw/A/QUMeQqJRaHTA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778449420; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e6QLVY/ygljFB2CoCiKzN5NUU0E1YfCNJO6WTTpSblQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eXaaM63/PjhUXNCsiDhLgdPDLQ3c3fBREeQJBsQnRDcRS4bv716OiX4WQtWP3E16spLionBJ7lTfRmc7MG8vRflXPf1zOmOHXeqOtqlDMiFJb6V182aQPY+phSwgXgQUJDSOZPU+Ka2YAe3RkoRIGg6Gp6zNw1wCP1QD3OR7nso= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=v6T8l9ou; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="v6T8l9ou" Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id EF18760177; Sun, 10 May 2026 23:43:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1778449410; bh=SC3z/yO2zohxkJUb8g+Hs2JV+obUQ79fYv5nyTHP0q0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=v6T8l9ou22Kn89pV0rCyFcANEJ4rxE0lNVExYWnIWNkx604Z1zOY7F5k3quFWGXZC 2nOFOc1Tb3Z3GVKcUkr7O03qGsIwp24hNb5ST+k7uH0gscwbfWJRml5Z+eIyGWwcgx SJlAobTPhnpvcOJAFsV/74eZzg6dwviLOyFqHyiYozmLnlka78vb0Hg8DPYCbGFl4j wzKJJPUzOpTUUTh5TkttVrra0FyTIzl42VdSEjd7fUPSiJixw1WFpfAZ0JeOUd4AxG rBozZDovzZH9WWHaZ3wVIzWIBV2Dh862tHh+vBraVmNAaVphRFjUfOJidNCaJje4KA eg4Fuf5Ro0k8g== Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 23:43:27 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Florian Westphal Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] netfilter: ipset fixes Message-ID: References: <20260508205903.10238-1-kadlec@netfilter.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, May 09, 2026 at 10:09:01AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > > Hi Pablo, > > > > Here follows the new revision of the fixes for the current list > > of ipset related issues. If sashiko won't find any issues in > > the patches themselves, then please consider applying them. > > I think it would make sense to start taking the first 4 patches so we > make some progress here and Jozsef doesn't have to respin all patches. > > What do you think? Agreed.