From: Samuele Mariotti <smariotti@disroot.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
void@manifault.com, changwoo@igalia.com,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix spurious WARN on stale ops_state in ops_dequeue()
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 11:13:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agV8-RlKEkiAbd-h@cachyos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agTYojgRwDH67QMC@slm.duckdns.org>
Hi Tejun,
>Let's not do the WARN and exit. We shouldn't get this wrong and if we get
>this wrong, it's going to be obvious from lockup detectors. Can you please
>add a comment explaining the retry condition tho?
>
>Thanks.
>
>--
>tejun
Thanks for the feedback. If I understood correctly, you prefer no retry
limit, letting the lockup detectors catch any real bug. I also added
unlikely() since the stale case is by definition rare.
Here is the updated version:
/*
* If SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY is not set, opss is stale: finish_dispatch()
* has already claimed the task and cleared SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY. Retry
* to get a fresh view of p->scx.ops_state.
*/
if (unlikely(!(READ_ONCE(p->scx.flags) & SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY))) {
cpu_relax();
goto retry;
}
Let me know if this looks good to you.
Thanks,
Samuele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 9:53 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix spurious WARN on stale ops_state in ops_dequeue() Samuele Mariotti
2026-05-13 14:26 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-13 16:41 ` Samuele Mariotti
2026-05-13 16:49 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-13 20:01 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-14 9:13 ` Samuele Mariotti [this message]
2026-05-14 20:08 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-14 4:00 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agV8-RlKEkiAbd-h@cachyos \
--to=smariotti@disroot.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.