From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] landlock: Documentation wording cleanups
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 21:19:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agjBUgqr1b908oWn@devuan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260516190112.4924-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2294 bytes --]
Hi Günther,
> Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
I don't use that address anymore. (The gmail account still exists, but
I'll eventually remove it.)
On 2026-05-16T21:01:12+0200, Günther Noack wrote:
> Documentation cleanups suggested by Alejandro Colomar,
> which we have also applied in the man pages.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/agW4yMK6CinJGqXt@devuan/
> Suggested-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/landlock.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> index 10a346e55e95..48c12ddf1108 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> @@ -255,16 +255,16 @@ struct landlock_net_port_attr {
> * :manpage:`connect(2)` as well as calls to :manpage:`sendmsg(2)` with an
> * explicit recipient address.
> *
> - * This access right only applies to connections to UNIX server sockets which
> + * This access right applies only to connections to UNIX server sockets which
Yup. As a reminder, 'only' applies to whatever comes immediately after
it.
> * were created outside of the newly created Landlock domain (e.g. from within
> * a parent domain or from an unrestricted process). Newly created UNIX
> * servers within the same Landlock domain continue to be accessible. In this
> * regard, %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX has the same semantics as the
> * ``LANDLOCK_SCOPE_*`` flags.
> *
> - * If a resolve attempt is denied, the operation returns an ``EACCES`` error,
> - * in line with other filesystem access rights (but different to denials for
> - * abstract UNIX domain sockets).
> + * If a resolution attempt is denied, the operation returns an ``EACCES``
> + * error, in line with other filesystem access rights (but different to
> + * denials for abstract UNIX domain sockets).
I.e.: s/resolve/resolution/
I miss semantic newlines! :)
Have a lovely day!
Alex
> *
> * This access right is available since the ninth version of the Landlock ABI.
> *
> --
> 2.54.0
>
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-16 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-16 19:01 [PATCH] landlock: Documentation wording cleanups Günther Noack
2026-05-16 19:19 ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agjBUgqr1b908oWn@devuan \
--to=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.