From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69A44389473 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 08:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=65.246.80.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780301558; cv=none; b=OuttCoLBqUQjX9ylua161GzZ0OHIcnAc4yHA2oavNsWAAzvNGJRawpdA7vT5bpE/veWmfoBRujgPQrFPLAiGCMprpwF3RjvLIiz6ShuNEj+tlKJC3x2Xyss2oF2TmJzQGcXK7pRfDNfMU6Hj/Iic9toC5+YVF0zyKIOSWD1BTtw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780301558; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kylLGATv0ykSy65kMisgWiJSj9UMi9dbQiF9mlE7V8Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZpkVlHu1SO0VzxDiqQkjST3aFZmO2nnV4q7+KAySK3p+AM7Yf0gZ8WZuzJcef2eTk6AIdQh/NrplcZ++acnp6ZCny0BALCknaQr1gH4dGFh4kKMgbDwtg7AXOqwd4kuHRzkvEIswRDFkbA0bde0M2emkqNkHpjNgfGd2szqIF2M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=orlitzky.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=orlitzky.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=orlitzky.com header.i=@orlitzky.com header.b=t5aaCPsf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=65.246.80.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=orlitzky.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=orlitzky.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=orlitzky.com header.i=@orlitzky.com header.b="t5aaCPsf" Received: from mertle.michael.orlitzky.com (vpn1.metro-data.com [65.213.236.242]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519MLKEM768 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4gTRXM0QyGz3ycR; Mon, 01 Jun 2026 04:12:35 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orlitzky.com; s=mail2; t=1780301555; bh=kylLGATv0ykSy65kMisgWiJSj9UMi9dbQiF9mlE7V8Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=t5aaCPsfuLMFg+/9E7LRISnqtntqSsTyan2bSsS0E2wduPUJdtA7I3dFpmaoilEYB N1kRDrUyPLbSq0LgZnfo0Z7BaJHZuEsFqBtR9/fiQJqS7f2Yh3ND/mL+N4A+ID4hIY ck7ROf6Q9Q2WfPX+rZdoN+AVBxBgdtDNGIE/2z/I= Received: by mertle.michael.orlitzky.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6EF4E12C349D; Mon, 01 Jun 2026 04:12:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 04:12:34 -0400 From: Michael Orlitzky To: Chen Wang Cc: sophgo@lists.linux.dev, Han Gao , Inochi Amaoto , Han Gao Subject: Re: SG2042 SATA (DMA?) issues Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: sophgo@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 2026-06-01 16:00:04, Chen Wang wrote: > > I'm a little confused about what you mean by "newer firmware." Do you > mean >= 017a5aea or > 017a5aea? > ... > Because in your last email you mentioned you discovered the problem > starting with b379b067. I have never tried 017a5aea, only b379b067.