From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A66136607C for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 21:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780349099; cv=none; b=erML5MH9Y9Mjy0Ki3eLVRQgpkPXzKjAi7g4GIey1hknm/pitLY56D5cjjO/D0rI0Ok7IeVgNHVFEcVJTsZa/UJgTZz1gcKN67RWJ2tY7KUqfAhN3bFcm4O/Ad4iFIsDLZd/A0DpdGBvWbe/ERNy/YI4Pw4zwFS4B6iZgQNh4KLc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780349099; c=relaxed/simple; bh=igvdkKpDFvMUBn8o21/DOJfBj/nAcBR91vp+rYp8ew0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CB/ABlwUmJ8oLC5Abwp7UDqZatP+CNLJe2XOJrRWlxkCOQ7GbiObm/YR9v7sUAmBvDofFvb85tRqcpqr1nmF+m0ntCaciI5/jIx1lf+jUipeqY9zo8RV1N6jsaIJaFDBsLRSwqQ7jwYmn/epUpYXUBi/IRu9PphNYIsMEwKAZcU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=YbAKiCmz; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=cz3g1Gty; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="YbAKiCmz"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="cz3g1Gty" Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 23:24:54 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1780349096; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nfjfA9mtHJQA56wSPl6uwvQid8QXNIVOMT4kBU2Lkf8=; b=YbAKiCmzLslyjyA6wQCEi6lh0gz2FjY3/C7aHk6bYRulm/VNqfmaSKA3rfoM85vgmM4db8 2CGOf/CZE14iD6+ovTCwBfEXFCXDXfQELMYqSfCcJ0mz/m4/VJNEOnr9sOP9qCqwSb8Qff V/AzeWk9PdxwTWkgYaE6K1kYWyI0rnObQW9D7fBZnENw+3aSgvA3E3fE5Zwx4Gqtb+Pbl7 vp1vtsxI5LyAyN3V5H9gTcGFDCv55tEkpGGADJxaVxrLij9nEoy5DFSc83CzFrHmQP4cAb lOQCO06YY3e5QHVjiVwJgpA0K1K7x18bplMx+3L23yke5PmFaqFfDq1vLEicTw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1780349096; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nfjfA9mtHJQA56wSPl6uwvQid8QXNIVOMT4kBU2Lkf8=; b=cz3g1GtybMFGWegMIgx1aouN1mRLC7SLAGdaDlvdbYm9JFKoP8Zkuz24J0ug2FQQ2hnWGR ZJN6CFi5vlo8eyAg== From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Maciej Wieczor-Retman , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Cooper , "H. Peter Anvin" , Christian Ludloff , Sohil Mehta , John Ogness , x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 004/120] x86/cpuid: Introduce Message-ID: References: <20260528153923.403473-1-darwi@linutronix.de> <20260528153923.403473-5-darwi@linutronix.de> <20260601194150.GDah3gfjoIZIByCa3d@fat_crate.local> <20260601203452.GAah3s7FevsRDFT7rF@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260601203452.GAah3s7FevsRDFT7rF@fat_crate.local> On Mon, 01 Jun 2026, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 09:53:32PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > > I'm doing another iteration of this PQ this week, along with a minor > > x86-cpuid-db release to fix those couple of fields. > > Maciej found it and I'd like to give him the credit for it. So Maciej please > do a patch ontop of current tip:x86/cpu so that I can pick it up. > Maciej should first send a patch to x86-cpuid-db.¹ Then the header generated by the tool can be submitted on top of tip:x86/cpu. This is for example how it was done in the merged commits: 49394b5af45c tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.4 300ba891418a tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.3 5e0c3c5e95f0 tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.2 ... One component of this work is that you and the other x86 maintainers will enforce that "auto generated header" rule; unless something really urgent pops up and common sense applies. But a single, yet unused, bitfield spelling mistak is not that urgent to warrant breaking the rule from the get go. ¹ https://gitlab.com/x86-cpuid.org/x86-cpuid-db/-/blob/tip/CONTRIBUTING.rst Thanks, Ahmed