From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 249FCCD6E4A for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 09:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC64E3E30BF for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:05:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 508833D0861 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:04:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C00A0100203B for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:04:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7876BD15; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 09:04:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1780391093; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SxMoYJleNLkMld/eaDv5WrQM+0LrVAQxCO2JQZIZoTM=; b=CfWixVEPb5YDFMZ25diLlcYDTSxOpVa7FxhynSQ7ijOFrkj/iXKMH3ViRAz/lK8Yrg2Rto VBh6U0Q+KP4NXBIg4jLrA4VYa03kTlu9YFfr5t3+MbZtqRzivlsp+xytwOw13kJVwzkeRO WvaY6K3wj5k1eWzMgjaoKzXPiPUAWoo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1780391093; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SxMoYJleNLkMld/eaDv5WrQM+0LrVAQxCO2JQZIZoTM=; b=AQJGZMv9CIjqVlWjeiJ4aCOo1G6UPWhPuiM1xS2IXMoKe335J/jPlOD72f15lOYWa58XvK 9CTTCG7JvUgKmKBQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1780391093; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SxMoYJleNLkMld/eaDv5WrQM+0LrVAQxCO2JQZIZoTM=; b=CfWixVEPb5YDFMZ25diLlcYDTSxOpVa7FxhynSQ7ijOFrkj/iXKMH3ViRAz/lK8Yrg2Rto VBh6U0Q+KP4NXBIg4jLrA4VYa03kTlu9YFfr5t3+MbZtqRzivlsp+xytwOw13kJVwzkeRO WvaY6K3wj5k1eWzMgjaoKzXPiPUAWoo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1780391093; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SxMoYJleNLkMld/eaDv5WrQM+0LrVAQxCO2JQZIZoTM=; b=AQJGZMv9CIjqVlWjeiJ4aCOo1G6UPWhPuiM1xS2IXMoKe335J/jPlOD72f15lOYWa58XvK 9CTTCG7JvUgKmKBQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E661B779A7; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 09:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id rWyINrScHmqrNQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 02 Jun 2026 09:04:52 +0000 Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:04:48 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20260601-doc_update-v1-0-b0f59834fbae@suse.com> <20260601-doc_update-v1-3-b0f59834fbae@suse.com> <20260601140901.GD3391768@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260601140901.GD3391768@pevik> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.30 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:email] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 3/4] include: Fix kernel-doc warnings in header comments X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Test Project Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > Downgrade kernel-doc comments to plain comments for struct tst_cmd > > and TST_CAP() macro to avoid name collisions with the tst_cmd() > > function and struct tst_cap respectively. The kernel-doc parser > > flattens names case-insensitively, causing 'name used several times' > > errors and duplicate target warnings. > > Hm ... > > ... > > +++ b/include/tst_capability.h > > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ struct tst_cap { > > char *name; > > }; > > > -/** > > +/* > > * TST_CAP() - Create a struct tst_cap entry. > > This is the only warning I'd prefer to stay unfixed (i.e. it was kept in the > docs). I wonder if we shouldn't jus rename struct or macro. Because TST_CAP() > should be documented. Cyril @WDYT? Looking at the resulting html pages both the structure and the function is documented properly there. Also as long as we use c:func: and c:type: in referencies everything should work. So I vote for ignoring this as well. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp