From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4982F14BF92 for ; Fri, 22 May 2026 15:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779463502; cv=none; b=icpCZXxKJUMyzt3i6ifHmLrBcXfwMIJAit7jqAqy/4KnWKKajepaioNhmD+1Um+l9COS2HTPjC9TQ9MLo0g2bGB74hZKiZ2adReNOQkFMlA7JAhpDN7+9ySXFaTEuw8Vj+OiGd91M4ybHUr40zp9JJfw4izwFY9yZknXqg671PU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779463502; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GxTbUr6x+M7ZHoZ3NBZ9Y3WIKLUUGmZjfjK0lKOcyfo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GZSjHNEa/tAJtl9BAdggDrkqQsBuFxPt5p3f7wYT7Kr8fuegL8PnCqg9CsOSVU0Pqzy4pmGlbuJ0Y08vjJgHCH2rg6ONX0Kj00pBSZI3XupMDHur3DeAW1RxSpWNcvhMDdsQrxLoUsOsNe8QriHyqVz7SzpybgsJCaje5Kb5Arg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=FWERowcu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FWERowcu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1779463498; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GxTbUr6x+M7ZHoZ3NBZ9Y3WIKLUUGmZjfjK0lKOcyfo=; b=FWERowcuZqHtVnIzRQSyQbJkjswkvqVTx9kmxwfvza8GBrR5vTBKP13qGghYEYPDoc0dZ0 yyPyRBnSwtXRvQrXnauW7bwQMJCSG8LE92GPPwV7LZkadmMv4kVtypn0tq76peHbprvuPx X3+bZ5v/uTSTdFyUJc+qjOhSWam8CsI= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-331-IS_6Rkx8NO236rocaT2tXg-1; Fri, 22 May 2026 11:24:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: IS_6Rkx8NO236rocaT2tXg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: IS_6Rkx8NO236rocaT2tXg_1779463493 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1EE01956080; Fri, 22 May 2026 15:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.44.48.45]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B92171800576; Fri, 22 May 2026 15:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fedora (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Fri, 22 May 2026 17:24:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 17:24:47 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andrea Calabrese Cc: brauner@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@kernel.org, kexinsun@smail.nju.edu.cn, adrianhuang0701@gmail.com, elver@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel: refactor: shorten has_pending_signals Message-ID: References: <20260520062849.183621-2-andrea.calabrese@amarulasolutions.com> <458080f9217ec3078d3d8e171582c15e428c3c6e.camel@amarulasolutios.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 On 05/21, Andrea Calabrese wrote: > > Looking for a suggestion here: I have the objdumps before and after, > and I see that the assembly with this modification does change. OK, lets forget it, lets stay with V2. Oleg.