From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Icenowy Zheng <zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/client: check whether CRTC is active before waiting for vblank
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 16:28:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahBZ8nIqR4qESLZg@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4b2e8cb-dd7c-42c2-88b7-0a2ab95a90ee@suse.de>
On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 03:24:05PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 22.05.26 um 15:13 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 01:55:59PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Am 19.05.26 um 11:24 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> >>> Currently the implementaion of drm_client_modeset_wait_for_vblank()
> >>> assumes drm_vblank_get() will fail when the CRTC isn't active. However
> >>> it seems that this is not true, and running fbcon on a device with the
> >>> first CRTC inactive will lead to kernel warning in some cases (which
> >>> could be reproduced with the loongson driver).
> >>>
> >>> Change the implementation to add a check for the active state (atomic) /
> >>> enabled state (non-atomic) before calling drm_vblank_get(). As the
> >>> assumption of drm_vblank_get() failing for inactive CRTC isn't met, the
> >>> error status of drm_vblank_get() can now be exported too.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >>> Fixes: d8c4bddcd8bc ("drm/fb-helper: Synchronize dirty worker with vblank")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> >>> index bb49b8361271a..1b03bf351256e 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> >>> @@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ int drm_client_modeset_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_client_dev *client, unsigned i
> >>> {
> >>> struct drm_device *dev = client->dev;
> >>> struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> >>> - int ret;
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>>
> >>> /*
> >>> * Rate-limit update frequency to vblank. If there's a DRM master
> >>> @@ -1326,15 +1326,24 @@ int drm_client_modeset_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_client_dev *client, unsigned i
> >>> * Only wait for a vblank event if the CRTC is enabled, otherwise
> >>> * just don't do anything, not even report an error.
> >>> */
> >>> + if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev)) {
> >>> + if (!crtc->state || !crtc->state->active)
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + if (!crtc->enabled)
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >> This part is good.
> > Locking is missing.
>
> Ok
>
> >
> >>> ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
> >>> if (!ret) {
> >>> drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank(crtc);
> >>> drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +out:
> >>> drm_master_internal_release(dev);
> >>>
> >>> - return 0;
> >>> + return ret;
> >> But this isn't. There can be CRTCs without any vblank at all. We still
> >> want to fail silently for them. So we still have to return 0 here.
> >>
> >> Having set this, fixing this helper is only partially what you want.
> >> Since your device has vblanking, the emulation should check on the
> >> correct CRTC. IOW you need to pass the right CRTC index at
> >>
> >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1-rc1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c#L237
> >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1-rc1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c#L920
> >>
> >> I'm not quite sure how to support this. The CRTC is under
> >> fb_helper->client.modesets.crtc. You'd have to figure out which is the
> >> relevant one and use that. But that's also not so great, as fbdev ioctls
> >> only support CRTC 0. Doing internal re-mappings only complicates matters.
> >>
> >> But why does your HW use CRTC 1 in the first place.
> > Could be eg. the enabled outputs can't be driven with CRTC 0.
> >
> > I guess what you want to do is pick the first crtc from modesets[]
> > which is enabled. Or perhaps even "pick the Nth enabled crtc from
> > modesets[] based on the ioctl argument".
>
> The enable-status of each CRTC could change later on, which might lead
> to problems.
Sound like a locking issue if someone is changing the configuration
at the same time we're trying to do the vblank wait here.
> Picking the one CRTC/output with the lowest spec and
> mirroring it to the others might work. This CRTC would then be the one
> to wait for.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> >
>
> --
> --
> Thomas Zimmermann
> Graphics Driver Developer
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, www.suse.com
> GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich, (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 9:24 [PATCH] drm/client: check whether CRTC is active before waiting for vblank Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-19 9:41 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-19 11:29 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-22 9:23 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2026-05-22 9:48 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-22 11:55 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-22 13:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-05-22 13:24 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-22 13:28 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2026-05-22 13:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-22 14:01 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-22 14:09 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-22 19:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-05-25 8:13 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2026-05-25 12:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-05-26 11:14 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2026-05-26 14:49 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-05-26 7:59 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-26 8:18 ` Icenowy Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahBZ8nIqR4qESLZg@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=uwu@icenowy.me \
--cc=zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.