From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017F525B080 for ; Sat, 23 May 2026 08:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779524930; cv=none; b=RHEVTAifoJALhsViDceddENwzhjHbRDuqzlPywtWRz5ZtBNdM+N/ADeNLM9SvapGdBPnCXeMz6F/jVMtoTBpmVLuAWAnvBEIz7RrO6678tdVbrMe0FHjl3DJ8X+s7OGMq8Odb62QY7rW0qodLp1nM1LdyL5/lZ2lWaGWqSADJ8s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779524930; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jB9FDhrNwOL64ty/eoFc2tYfqdHa1Dk3JDsG8h92c4U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QTlxWaTK/8oBTLMUGlLMR4rvza0utREy14tOgH2zknDQHLk/5xIPiN+TolwHoMdd6zxhFfyM6WOBZnc8JoPdYCpUe6COEQA5XkMVl2vK5NKeQYflR8VWsN270wc4l3FatOodxm6Jj+NfbWVNq0M1aYMjeedoJGmjT5qWargZfdU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=MXnPHn5a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="MXnPHn5a" Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id CD95A60181; Sat, 23 May 2026 10:28:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1779524925; bh=Il+Zh+N7xGCUsk3cWs4cpxAeLU/kwEKT13OdDSWA6yw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MXnPHn5aKhrkRlb/24KvctA+IbormNGb6bE7Bs7QA7Hf8RvvCNMwJRg/aDKAiaBxO +6rtafrZaiaESuhRQ8KUHzsep3GiW3argQh+zEDDLTgSsCEb0U5Jgq8beisgeYbRml kA9xQg9ey0V8d2hRG4H/FbMY32uoB+EGKKCiBBL5GIrDuTjEUH94eEpdP3lsu4IBUu CiiZtKgz6QVjbC0GB+iPECfHfNJzp5JI0hyCxpKRRk99HOSBeIQQPJz1XSTwMmK53z y0MMRD6XmIoK5RvbqgUx2JZLs7lvstlSmZQfCj42m139h2aaxq/u7dGgwbMuCP7s1T Zoz3l1tgT+YDQ== Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 10:28:42 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Florian Westphal Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/5] netfilter: conntrack: remove some code Message-ID: References: <20260522050140.4838-1-fw@strlen.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 09:26:29AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > I have been working this week on fixing the helper infrastructure as I > > told you, my series is directly clashing with this. > > It's is taking me a bit of time to make sure to validate this is > > correct but I can hopefully post it asap. > > No need to rush, this one needs a new revision anyway. I will wait > until your series is applied before doing a v2. I am finishing the review and testing, it is a change in the direction of the previous series to tackle the issues, by dynamically allocating the timeout and helper and refcnt to track packet path/ct extension users. I can post this series later today / early morning tomorrow. > If you like you can integrate the last patch of this series (irc/pptp > deprecation) into yours, that patch isn' strictly related to the > others. Thanks, if my fixes are deemed correct, I'd appreciate that rebase on top.