Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Remove deep-pkgc subtest

["Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 07:41:29PM +0530, Thasleem, Mohammed wrote:
> 
> On 17-04-2026 06:04 pm, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 02:04:59PM +0530, Mohammed Thasleem wrote:
> >> Remove the deep-pkgc subtest as it depends on other display IPs which makes
> >> testing unreliable. Current validation uses Package C-state counters that
> >> are affected by unrelated system components and requires platform-specific
> >> checks that vary across different platforms.
> >> A redesigned test with proper display IP isolation will be implemented
> >> in a future patch.
> > What is the actual plan for that? How would it even be implemented
> > and when should we expect to get it?
> It's in discussion with hardware design team to come up with hooks for 
> better validation and tracking.

And how are you going to catch regression on current systems?

> >> Mohammed Thasleem (7):
> >>    Revert "tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Ensure eDP detection before skipping
> >>      test"
> >>    Revert "tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Add polling for deep-pkgc"
> >>    Revert "tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Update test duration to 4 seconds"
> >>    Revert "tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Update VRR handling and eDP output
> >>      check"
> >>    Revert "tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Add time unit macros and update delay
> >>      calculation"
> >>    Revert "tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Add a new test to validate the deep
> >>      sleep state during extended vblank"
> >>    tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove unused pkgc functions
> >>
> >>   tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c | 98 -----------------------------------------
> >>   1 file changed, 98 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> 2.43.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel