From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Add bvec_folio()
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 18:47:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahXcsrxUFfzoVCOr@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ahVBCtsodsM2FHis@infradead.org>
On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 11:43:22PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 02:29:27PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > So I'm not against the function per se, but the documentation must
> > > explain the minefields it is stepping into a bit better.
> >
> > Lower level drivers shouldn't be concerning themselves with folios.
> > For a start, we can put non-folios (eg slab memory) into bvecs.
>
> Well, that is a very good thing to put into the comment. We can also
> put them into high-level bvecs, so framing this as 'only use if you
> know the memory is folios, which you can't unless you are the entity
> who filled the bio' might be a good choice.
How about:
/**
* bvec_folio - Return the first folio referenced by this bvec
* @bv: bvec to access
*
* bvecs can contain non-folio memory, so this should only be called by
* the creator of the bvec; drivers have no business looking at the owner
* of the memory. It may not even be the right interface for the caller
* to use as bvecs can span multiple folios. You may be better off using
* something like bio_for_each_folio_all() which iterates over all folios.
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 18:21 [PATCH] block: Add bvec_folio() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-05-25 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-25 13:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-05-26 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-26 17:47 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2026-05-27 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-27 15:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahXcsrxUFfzoVCOr@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.