From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-172.mta1.migadu.com (out-172.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A39363C5A for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 03:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779852366; cv=none; b=WuSZL73oXm+vc/W2dZ+RNZDSnJssdrOd0sNB0K65KUoteobYVlk6ih6nmnhthfszS74yKvxjtIK50EcZT0HYv6CtwwtRzKkVD3RGWNHORVmn8+qu/bWxE73RJ4pN+PwkWQ3bDj9SE3CIx+M8wjboA4LI9Mkxjg2hKjXANyqzHMQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779852366; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wnmkhjeE5RdoDXeYDxzbl8e9vBba6gfAw/urLSGoVY4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=frI57WJr1VTK56HIUyEcGSYDugyvIrh4c0aZEOo97sbG4SF9rz5vGO6ShjTM4gDm/ER0Vc9ksVQt4IPt7ZjXxfM35WMxithkkJJ3qRULQF4JmaJh8wDODe5bfmpzB9BVgAFLkXafAagEbmLpJZ6P1eYWA7rPVLezJwRxq36kc80= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=hf0SL4wf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="hf0SL4wf" Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 20:25:39 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1779852360; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/tRm+zsnDmuyGHwdztYsUXcSwovq8J4jp1TlNqlOchs=; b=hf0SL4wfqtfohYS34VQmpkzQC1T2f4e2S33zRiUVq/e0eBKYZOoNJwGW4UupbR0y79IqRT j9OVQFwe7fC1fT3Yu+jv78Z64gfWLRF9Ix3dRMeInBmJuGf0tYNGmjZYmJbPelfMuCbXp/ eA85Or/x6/Hob/gClTgxrE6eO4BcEFs= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Shakeel Butt To: Andrew Morton Cc: Kairui Song , linux-mm@kvack.org, Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , Johannes Weiner , David Hildenbrand , Michal Hocko , Lorenzo Stoakes , Barry Song , David Stevens , Chen Ridong , Leno Hou , Yafang Shao , Yu Zhao , Zicheng Wang , Baolin Wang , Kalesh Singh , Suren Baghdasaryan , Chris Li , Vernon Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] mm/mglru: improve reclaim loop and dirty folio handling Message-ID: References: <20260428-mglru-reclaim-v7-0-02fabb92dc43@tencent.com> <20260526183506.ffb1bbe41043c6247557caa1@linux-foundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260526183506.ffb1bbe41043c6247557caa1@linux-foundation.org> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 06:35:06PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2026 22:56:21 -0700 Shakeel Butt wrote: > > > > > Please include traditional LRU results for all of the following experiments as > > > > well (where it makes sense). > > > > > > Sure, I've spawn a few test instances, was busy travelling last week. > > > That specific test machine is occupied so it might take a while. > > > > > > A systematic test run takes roughly one or two days to complete for > > > one kernel version or config, e.g. the JS test takes at least 2 hours > > > to finish. Comparing versions/setups takes more time. > > > > > > > No worries, we have couple of weeks before the next merge window, so no urgency. > > Well, no, not really. Some schmuck wants to get our > stable-non-rebasing branch into upstreamable shape well before the next > merge window. > > This series was issued a month ago! > > Sorry to crack the whip, but let's please all be aware or our > upstreaming timing. Thanks for the reminder. > > > I will go through the series in depth, hopefully there will not be a need for > > next version and in that case, please just resend the cover letter with the > > information you provided below and don't worry about the length of the cover > > letter. > > That's a plan. > > Happily, MGRLU changes are well-isolated so I was able to trivially > move this series to the tail of mm-unstable. > > It isn't a problem at all for me to defer this until the next cycle - > please let me know. I am on it and will aim to be done by weekend. > > I'd like to know this as early as possible so I can hide the series > until after -rc1. We shouldn't have "not for next merge window" > material in there possibly invalidating our ongoing testing. Ack.