From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4613254BB for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 15:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779896797; cv=none; b=uVs/NCaTgZJpjVtkaRrF6aazX3RPz7dqDUNzhlZeo1LckVoxIDZ/y0wVtMv519QHUMie2YpM38CtVBvlngavHrcGZt42g/nNC2SZ0iAqRFAB/8LOwv6vfV8l0201Hnl8Jgvyt58N+pFDllIi/Bf8Cr0kuP1cez+uw98s1Lnf/Fw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779896797; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RSJpJJqFdrJxLEE58UNzbaTpmKMjawEvkKpKdcyr8wA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=j4IHCo01p5vCnQsQLlK59pase7exA+PXn/Q2vUZNsnR9CG8WiT0IVk+QMn4QoiKR0XYfI+6DdaQs9Kjgvw3veT2LGL3iYZVVK59vyXV2gBxCpnYXS7oVMLAqSXGsgt649YwVDv/uyBL2G5BPXtAuBS6OjT5OhUnDOt9s5k4JbhU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=H7MSrAo8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="H7MSrAo8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69C531F000E9; Wed, 27 May 2026 15:46:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779896795; bh=RSJpJJqFdrJxLEE58UNzbaTpmKMjawEvkKpKdcyr8wA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=H7MSrAo8cnQvLI7EPixVHkikvrIZADmroiUQfYgvY1GI9mdmz/AugHzwUEl9uVrgt l0nL/7tCMaOg9Z+/4s4ccWcQXQ0ZNXHK2zM/pT233kVgaHmZVU53EnAHeazc1xshVK b5c949ARCZf70qKNwXUtrKlL0/bGknMvwWuKMNwp9HtkpjO2KVctFmMLXcMovMOLy5 S9I5oEMMZHjYfPnDsDYto0PmynQmQ6VVSR9oht63oYRcz9xgwMdNLEuXDZqcNZz0Xd Z1SD5r/LjXPOoJCimqbWkSHSVlP35GgvodWMDAj2eG0+5jA7gzyrqUrZda89TTnhCT iybmIFNKYt+vg== Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 09:46:34 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Chao Shi Cc: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Chaitanya Kulkarni , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sungwoo Kim , Dave Tian , Weidong Zhu Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: bound the freeze drain in passthrough commands Message-ID: References: <20260527055923.456769-1-coshi036@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260527055923.456769-1-coshi036@gmail.com> On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 01:59:23AM -0400, Chao Shi wrote: > If a completion is silently dropped or the device hangs, the calling > task wedges with ctrl->scan_lock and ctrl->subsys->lock held, fanning > out into hung-task reports on any concurrent open/close/passthru on > the same controller: The IO timeout callbacks that nvme drivers provide are supposed to forcefully reclaim any IO no matter what state the device is in. Is that not happening for some reason?