From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1D08CD5BD5 for ; Thu, 28 May 2026 16:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gRB7X3dZPz2xM7; Fri, 29 May 2026 02:01:44 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1779984104; cv=none; b=UR6UaWhVjSkhRaEp0PVl0/bxc/DA2oPEil9MOjx7d2XSwiBSRmyT1jgyqFU5cg7AdOa+BdmQrWwh8isRvY23V5BlR0D3RCv/RZo8VKlr9ofcKQuorx+UE/Vn13yEatUC7fenaEbZ4s0YDjKLhrYyQjV8tSm5+Hm+5ROSAif8IquLVA59be3TuzLOY58z0WKvBlpcN3ek6g8rxSbe6MjXLVsL1EAZ8ZN3fLKpSvPHPu4bNBA8X9/kQCOLA9RdoCM8vpsi3xjRzcJ84nlcz1IFXq0ZlC85RxAyNMN3S50Bgey6auIUUwURasw/9HHPiU23lKpUWX2i+SQbJoPtc2vnTw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1779984104; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=XQkdJmpo3JmApCgm6FlizNCVylDuF6POy+eYRX98q4A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fhqjxnAgCy17KCUE33PVJSgW0XH1PWwqIBoyxOzNsLlU1933QaFSD1bnYh+9ysMw/fECt96sFw0WLZ1zoxmM7+udQYLIyU9UmltmzMkpvOaDF2wC1piq4cvGqUu5YZ+D9mH6MhZDe692+32ZKj1EWF3TXmEghBAZvcoXIWV7pwGyYt8RuLqIAbWlCFM93RzkmUFxHRy9IeyIHa6B78aCtmZH/bcZLEOKTJrPwTZsvrupWXFkwerPb7MByM1Ro5O1NKJQNngAq+oH6Sa5RvWHhzfvpWyRUzN+CQ9TyidrEWPgVn9/zsoOtlP1K7MNq6jODnRROOvhkmwJS6BRqY9l7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=awgZ63pQ; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=srikar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=awgZ63pQ; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=srikar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gRB7W4msqz2xM6 for ; Fri, 29 May 2026 02:01:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 64SC9tS8035843; Thu, 28 May 2026 16:01:30 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=XQkdJmpo3JmApCgm6Fliz NCVylDuF6POy+eYRX98q4A=; b=awgZ63pQQhdHQH10YN6jmlb6UVs2Rphpn49Eb RdoEY7X40FJDnIFiNPjjcPXQFwka7F4ucKKa2Qbvx9CmuvSdT01SpnXUsdJKjD1C LUcjPQuwoA1b5DFtN3s6y3DklVUy6HB0t8G3GAvayQ+uVyx/0AOkzLhkOJLspi7C t68Whwz2cuWLbgD0JiUCvg+ZnfOHgcnuWoOB3jy+myxnkJLbtbl2i5l3S3G80MqV VFd1dElW1nMARxUmucIz3i9E6li+N5QWqs2sGmOH5IRIDWbm86TDddkVCTKLPT+Y CigmpBdSxLTX23yBzLadLDxzgb4OQcuTAk0MYT67sV+1iIolw== Received: from ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (db.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.219]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4ee88bbqcy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 May 2026 16:01:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.7/8.18.1.7) with ESMTP id 64SFs92Z031977; Thu, 28 May 2026 16:01:28 GMT Received: from smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.224]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4edjrb8utv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 May 2026 16:01:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.103]) by smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 64SG1PQU41812308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 28 May 2026 16:01:25 GMT Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22682004B; Thu, 28 May 2026 16:01:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF9120040; Thu, 28 May 2026 16:01:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.126.150.29]) by smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Thu, 28 May 2026 16:01:22 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 21:31:21 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Shrikanth Hegde Cc: Venkat Rao Bagalkote , Madhavan Srinivasan , Ritesh Harjani , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , LKML , linuxppc-dev , linux-sched@vger.kernel.org, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, K Prateek Nayak , Peter Zijlstra , "Chen, Yu C" Subject: Re: [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Message-ID: Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <51154de7-3700-4cb4-82f2-1b3a8fa427f7@linux.ibm.com> <8675afde-5c7f-4717-be7a-a473bd1af381@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjYwNTI4MDE1OCBTYWx0ZWRfX4korwaZaue1t 2eiT8yF1fyxNgq4nO2AupK3SCWPUQC1FpnNWoI99sVPpmHcw3bKQnGxzmOfY41mis7TWX2jUI0n DoY2ezOLYFhuqa9lzjBsopmLoayKqoM+OLrwNTAhcAqnunnsP+pH/svqmNYFB3ZpVBlaXWq0AxB 7oVPiPX9DTQ6BKSkhOIsnSz4zOLElvsys4kVsq4h097is9eftrVlrqljBQUUhsh2MijW4vyCBhl LTzm41pXS1QC9Mf1xqRBR+Lik5poIn4OuGlPBbvtlAgoiAzRCvvI9tqSm771C/QEH2vkpEvgm9V JloEFZR2QPhAcKMd9/Wbc5m9XMuYruSHhSkDY6bY3PljNf1dh1U59uSn3PPgY3Pk7gHq/oZJMOH ++urzHESVwXiIHfZ5wCCG8bhSWgGQ03PSnx5Bc7kHIU1M+tjgbQiVovFO1meA+HpJsnf6ODddCE /Enw/asUhxuuGYDEIkw== X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: bAmFYiY2BSOdJpW932MLCGeXnyHgt9LI X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=IJEyzAvG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6a1866d9 cx=c_pps a=aDMHemPKRhS1OARIsFnwRA==:117 a=aDMHemPKRhS1OARIsFnwRA==:17 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=NGcC8JguVDcA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=RnoormkPH1_aCDwRdu11:22 a=V8glGbnc2Ofi9Qvn3v5h:22 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=QyXUC8HyAAAA:8 a=F3R1hv1vQv_lyvgeWPUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 X-Proofpoint-GUID: bAmFYiY2BSOdJpW932MLCGeXnyHgt9LI X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1143,Hydra:6.1.125,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2026-05-28_04,2026-05-28_03,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.22.0-2605210000 definitions=main-2605280158 * Shrikanth Hegde [2026-05-27 12:35:20]: > On 5/26/26 10:54 AM, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote: > > > > On 26/05/26 9:38 am, Chen, Yu C wrote: > > > Hi Venkat, > > > > > > On 5/26/2026 11:14 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > > > * Chen, Yu C [2026-05-25 23:35:45]: > > > > > > > > > Hi Venkat, > > > > > > > > > > On 5/25/2026 10:07 PM, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote: > > > > > > Greetings!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > I am seeing an early boot kernel panic due to NULL pointer dereference > > > > > > on a POWER9 (pSeries) system when testing linux-next (next-20260522). > > > > > > This issue is seen on P11 as well. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Venkat. > > > > Venkat, > > Was it on P11 on Shared LPAR? I also thought the same. But I checked with Venkat, he said it was on a dedicated LPAR. My multiple tries on dedicated, didnt reproduce the problem. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju