All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	<stfomichev@gmail.com>, <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] selftests/xsk: Introduce helpers for setting UMEM properties
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 16:52:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiA/vvEkP0Sp8kUQ@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603060327.298389-2-tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>

On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 11:33:24AM +0530, Tushar Vyavahare wrote:
> UMEM properties are set via open-coded field assignments in multiple test
> paths, which makes updates noisy and error-prone.
> 
> Introduce two helpers to set UMEM properties through a single interface.
> This keeps setup logic consistent across tests and makes future refactoring
> simpler.
> 
> No functional behavior change is intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>

> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c       | 36 ++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
> index 7950c504ed28..3369450da974 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
> @@ -303,6 +303,18 @@ static void test_spec_reset(struct test_spec *test)
>  	__test_spec_init(test, test->ifobj_tx, test->ifobj_rx);
>  }
>  
> +static void test_spec_set_unaligned(struct test_spec *test)
> +{
> +	test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> +	test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_spec_set_frame_size(struct test_spec *test, u32 size)
> +{
> +	test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = size;
> +	test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = size;
> +}
> +
>  static void test_spec_set_xdp_prog(struct test_spec *test, struct bpf_program *xdp_prog_rx,
>  				   struct bpf_program *xdp_prog_tx, struct bpf_map *xskmap_rx,
>  				   struct bpf_map *xskmap_tx)
> @@ -2025,8 +2037,7 @@ int testapp_stats_fill_empty(struct test_spec *test)
>  
>  int testapp_send_receive_unaligned(struct test_spec *test)
>  {
> -	test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> -	test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> +	test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
>  	/* Let half of the packets straddle a 4K buffer boundary */
>  	if (pkt_stream_replace_half(test, MIN_PKT_SIZE, -MIN_PKT_SIZE / 2))
>  		return TEST_FAILURE;
> @@ -2037,8 +2048,7 @@ int testapp_send_receive_unaligned(struct test_spec *test)
>  int testapp_send_receive_unaligned_mb(struct test_spec *test)
>  {
>  	test->mtu = MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE;
> -	test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> -	test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> +	test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
>  	if (pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE))
>  		return TEST_FAILURE;
>  	return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
> @@ -2337,8 +2347,7 @@ int testapp_send_receive(struct test_spec *test)
>  
>  int testapp_send_receive_2k_frame(struct test_spec *test)
>  {
> -	test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
> -	test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
> +	test_spec_set_frame_size(test, 2048);
>  	if (pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, MIN_PKT_SIZE))
>  		return TEST_FAILURE;
>  	return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
> @@ -2363,15 +2372,13 @@ int testapp_aligned_inv_desc(struct test_spec *test)
>  
>  int testapp_aligned_inv_desc_2k_frame(struct test_spec *test)
>  {
> -	test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
> -	test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
> +	test_spec_set_frame_size(test, 2048);
>  	return testapp_invalid_desc(test);
>  }
>  
>  int testapp_unaligned_inv_desc(struct test_spec *test)
>  {
> -	test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> -	test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> +	test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
>  	return testapp_invalid_desc(test);
>  }
>  
> @@ -2380,10 +2387,8 @@ int testapp_unaligned_inv_desc_4001_frame(struct test_spec *test)
>  	u64 page_size, umem_size;
>  
>  	/* Odd frame size so the UMEM doesn't end near a page boundary. */
> -	test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 4001;
> -	test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 4001;
> -	test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> -	test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> +	test_spec_set_frame_size(test, 4001);
> +	test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
>  	/* This test exists to test descriptors that staddle the end of
>  	 * the UMEM but not a page.
>  	 */
> @@ -2402,8 +2407,7 @@ int testapp_aligned_inv_desc_mb(struct test_spec *test)
>  
>  int testapp_unaligned_inv_desc_mb(struct test_spec *test)
>  {
> -	test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> -	test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
> +	test_spec_set_unaligned(test);
>  	return testapp_invalid_desc_mb(test);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-03 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-03  6:03 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] selftests/xsk: simplify UMEM setup Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03  6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] selftests/xsk: Introduce helpers for setting UMEM properties Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 14:52   ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-06-03  6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] selftests/xsk: Move UMEM state from ifobject to xsk_socket_info Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 14:51   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-04  6:51     ` Vyavahare, Tushar
2026-06-03  6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] selftests/xsk: Use umem_size() helper consistently Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 15:34   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-03  6:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] selftests/xsk: Introduce mmap_size in umem struct Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-03 15:35   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-04  6:48   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aiA/vvEkP0Sp8kUQ@boxer \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
    --cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.