All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] netconsole: Fix reported problems
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 06:59:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiF-SG6mhZBt2jaF@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604130622.GB3920875@horms.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 02:06:22PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 07:26:56AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > These are some of the issues that LLM reported to netconsole, and they
> > are being addressed here before big refactors.
> >
> > I was doing some big refactors, and got some "pre-existent-issues"
> > during LLM review of the refactor, that make them hard to guarantee that
> > refactor is not introducing any bug, so, let's clean these pre-existent
> > bugs first, and then submit the refactor.
> >
> > The issues fixed in this patchset were reported during the review of
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260524-netconsole_move_more-v1-0-909d1ab398b4@debian.org/
> >
> > Not all of them got fixed, but, those that were easy to reason about.
> >
> > Why net-next and not 'net' tree.
> >
> > Most of the functions that are being fixed here moved from netpoll to
> > netconsole, thus, fixing this on net will cause merge conflicts from
> > 'net' to 'net-next', thus I decided to fix it on 'net-next', given we
> > are on 7.1-rc6 already. Sorry if that is not the right approach.
> >
> > Changed from v1:
> >   * Change it from 'net' to 'net-next'.
>
> Hi Breno,
>
> There is AI-generated review of this patch-set available on both
> https://sashiko.dev and https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/
>
> I would appreciate it if you could look over that with a view
> to addressing any issues that directly effect this patch-set.

Ack. While most of the reported issues are pre-existing are being fixed,
there is one genuine regression: invoking WARN_ON_ONCE() in a potential
NMI context is problematic since it may trigger panic_on_warn.

I will send a revised version.

Thanks,
--breno

--
pw-bot: cr

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-04 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-02 14:26 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] netconsole: Fix reported problems Breno Leitao
2026-06-02 14:26 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] netconsole: do not schedule skb pool refill from NMI Breno Leitao
2026-06-02 14:26 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] netconsole: do not dequeue pooled skbs that cannot satisfy len Breno Leitao
2026-06-02 14:26 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] netconsole: take target_cleanup_list_lock in drop_netconsole_target() Breno Leitao
2026-06-04 13:06 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] netconsole: Fix reported problems Simon Horman
2026-06-04 13:59   ` Breno Leitao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aiF-SG6mhZBt2jaF@gmail.com \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.