From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
james.clark@linaro.org, tycho@kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] perf/lock: enable end-timestamp accounting for cgroup aggregation
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 17:29:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiHgPNEztk-eALlN@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aiGoUxZvM46QiAUA@google.com>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 09:31:15AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 10:37:05AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 01:29:40AM +0530, Suchit Karunakaran wrote:
> > > update_lock_stat() handles lock contentions that start but never reach a
> > > contention_end event (e.g., locks still held when profiling stops), but
> > > previously treated LOCK_AGGR_CGROUP as a no-op due to missing cgroup
> > > context in userspace.
> > >
> > > Fix this by adding a cgroup_id field to struct tstamp_data, recording it
> > > at contention_begin using get_current_cgroup_id() when aggr_mode is
> > > LOCK_AGGR_CGROUP. Capturing it at contention_begin is semantically
> > > correct, the contention cost is incurred by the task that had to wait,
> > > not by whatever task happens to be running at contention_end. It is also
> > > preferable from a performance standpoint, as contention_end runs just
> > > before the task enters the critical section.
> > >
> > > Update contention_end to use pelem->cgroup_id instead of calling
> > > get_current_cgroup_id() dynamically, ensuring both complete and
> > > incomplete contention events attribute the wait time to the cgroup at
> > > wait-start time consistently.
> >
> > Namhyung, can you provide an Acked-by or Reviewed-by?
>
> Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, for v7.2.
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-30 19:59 [PATCH v2 RESEND] perf/lock: enable end-timestamp accounting for cgroup aggregation Suchit Karunakaran
2026-05-30 20:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 13:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-04 16:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-06-04 20:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiHgPNEztk-eALlN@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com \
--cc=tycho@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.