All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
To: hu.shengming@zte.com.cn
Cc: vbabka@kernel.org, harry@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	 cl@gentwo.org, rientjes@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	 linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zhang.run@zte.com.cn,  cai.qu@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/slub: preserve original size in _kmalloc_nolock_noprof retry path
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 15:27:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiJ5__26le84QuwK@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202606042027323804pk3MRY42Jy7y42OHAhQZ@zte.com.cn>

On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 08:27:32PM +0800, hu.shengming@zte.com.cn wrote:
> From: Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
> 
> _kmalloc_nolock_noprof() retries from the next kmalloc bucket when the
> initial allocation fails. The retry currently reuses `size` as the
> bucket selector and overwrites it with s->object_size + 1.
> 
> That value is later passed as the original allocation size to
> __slab_alloc_node(), slab_post_alloc_hook() and kasan_kmalloc(). On a
> successful retry this makes KASAN/slub-debug observe the retry bucket
> selector rather than the caller requested size, potentially widening the
> valid kmalloc range and hiding overflows.
> 
> Keep the caller requested size separately as orig_size and pass it to
> the allocation/debug/KASAN paths. Continue using `size` as the retry cache
> selector.
> 
> Fixes: af92793e52c3 ("slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock()")
> Signed-off-by: Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Use an explicit orig_size variable instead of bucket_size, as suggested
>   by Harry and Vlastimil.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260603211011530GqLSXP_rgcuQdR47IGQLL@zte.com.cn/
> 

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>

-- 
Thanks,
Hao


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-05  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-04 12:27 [PATCH v2] mm/slub: preserve original size in _kmalloc_nolock_noprof retry path hu.shengming
2026-06-05  5:59 ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-05  7:27 ` Hao Li [this message]
2026-06-05 11:48 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aiJ5__26le84QuwK@fedora \
    --to=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cai.qu@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=hu.shengming@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhang.run@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.