From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mlmmj.mlmmj.org (mlmmj.mlmmj.org [194.233.166.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5CBFCD8C9D for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2026 16:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37590 helo=mlmmj.mlmmj.org) by mlmmj.mlmmj.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wWcGR-00GhNw-2t for mlmmj@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2026 15:51:47 +0000 Received: from lax.catastrophe.net ([174.136.105.50]:39515) by mlmmj.mlmmj.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wWcGK-00GhMn-14 for mlmmj@mlmmj.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2026 15:51:40 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=catastrophe.net; s=default; t=1780934422; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WFwJtDxsZKlq+8+a7db+U/QXg7Ta8iZJgBKGAaVAFos=; b=A0/ZZvRqTegVL5osSAo+gigz1MGFbJ18lDSXmZTGsNLw5QuJWiU0+ntljtGlywKdFtc0Q8 /EGkTT+0ZrJfvgTX8lX4hcevMjslLICSG0EmISYgzvmxd1J98sQj94OBIjHZ+pMdP1Vmzk k9zr4tIcUsbajmjKqQfMvNV+wrfM93eYORoPVXDYX6i9QUiy9jhQ4dlG9XlPXpeuPLoEl5 iUt39Ii7kZCQdK/UdvEpyZUVLtNqHP0cktlT9yHwP42hjHIhe/15zHxMq/FfRJIYKySPcD eMfdtZRaB0WrP0KY+fXvd/OLLhKLkPmD9KONb55V9DCKSmQrzOkL7OqSKQreTw== Received: from localhost (lax.catastrophe.net [local]) by lax.catastrophe.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id baf96fbe for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2026 11:00:22 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 11:00:22 -0500 From: readme@catastrophe.net To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org Subject: Re: replyto control Message-ID: References: List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 10:53:06AM -0500, readme@catastrophe.net wrote: >I'm running 1.4.5 on OpenBSD 7.9 and replyto doesn't seem to add a >header when configured. Has this option been deprecated in lieu of >using customheaders? Oops, replyto does something totally different than adding a custom header. My fault; apologies for the noise.