From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] dma/pool: Add an API to check if DMA allocation is from pool
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 18:10:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aicFes0uxUFQAduC@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505002737.2213734-3-skhawaja@google.com>
On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 12:27:35AM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> DMA allocations can be done through DMA pools, add an API that can be
> used to check if an allocation is done from a pool. This will be used in
> the later commit during preservation of DMA allocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
> ---
> include/linux/dma-map-ops.h | 1 +
> kernel/dma/pool.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> index 6a1832a73cad..6a0bc4ea2467 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ struct page *dma_alloc_from_pool(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> bool (*phys_addr_ok)(struct device *, phys_addr_t, size_t));
> bool dma_free_from_pool(struct device *dev, void *start, size_t size);
>
> +bool dma_is_from_pool(struct device *dev, void *start, size_t size);
> int dma_direct_set_offset(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t cpu_start,
> dma_addr_t dma_start, u64 size);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/pool.c b/kernel/dma/pool.c
> index 2b2fbb709242..32ce4d6d7683 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/pool.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/pool.c
> @@ -307,3 +307,16 @@ bool dma_free_from_pool(struct device *dev, void *start, size_t size)
>
> return false;
> }
> +
> +bool dma_is_from_pool(struct device *dev, void *start, size_t size)
Do we need struct device here? It seems unused?
Nit: we only ever pass 0 gfp_flags to dma_guess_pool, should we instead
name it: dma_is_from_atomic_pool() to be more accurate?
> +{
> + struct gen_pool *pool = NULL;
> +
> + while ((pool = dma_guess_pool(pool, 0))) {
> + if (!gen_pool_has_addr(pool, (unsigned long)start, size))
> + continue;
> + return true;
> + }
Nit: The loop looks slightly ugly, can we have:
struct gen_pool *pool;
for (pool = dma_guess_pool(NULL, 0); pool != NULL; pool = dma_guess_pool(pool, 0)) {
if (gen_pool_has_addr(pool, (unsigned long)start, size))
return true;
}
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> --
> 2.54.0.545.g6539524ca2-goog
>
Thanks,
Praan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 0:27 [RFC PATCH 0/4] dma-mapping: Add preservation of direct allocations Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-05 0:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] dma: Add DMA allocation preservation KHO ABI Samiullah Khawaja
2026-06-08 17:53 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-05 0:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] dma/pool: Add an API to check if DMA allocation is from pool Samiullah Khawaja
2026-06-08 18:10 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-05-05 0:27 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] dma-direct: Add API to preserve/restore allocations Samiullah Khawaja
2026-06-01 12:35 ` Will Deacon
2026-06-02 20:14 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-06-08 19:55 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-05 0:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] dma-mapping: Add API to preserve/restore DMA allocation Samiullah Khawaja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aicFes0uxUFQAduC@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.