From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f201.google.com (mail-pl1-f201.google.com [209.85.214.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 728AC305693 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 18:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782411147; cv=none; b=YwRRi8x54LVph3QWeucPejKTjrAu5VjgoVVYcy3O1zcUd3Oq3z2xutWnu4USp+KnGOruBpyUyNFvqL32k9BSa5DH1qOHJrye0LLI5ndLx61DHSrviDMI6JZ6jYLk2Ct2zu1buoYBW68asw+EzSZJZNcg8u0jn/oZyBtV3jxUSY4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782411147; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1mmqybtyyz3V7YDYArUGJdTCwOdw8wCbGqaGSAkZixQ=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=J8DzhnOD8Uhr7BMC433292v5KDUqW4Z+0Z88aeZ0sCHAdmwLTSOu8BqeYToZzA7vRx/t1F6fpsRD/SWS0JpiVHjnn9yDtV8P7NAVwulBT9YP5/msAjiBrLOCs39WzseSue5Zhi8THUIHhenp1mZbFRaGuZ3ly/e4YLAOGraI/gw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=fHH33G+f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="fHH33G+f" Received: by mail-pl1-f201.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2c8018f11fbso1557285ad.3 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:12:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1782411146; x=1783015946; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1mmqybtyyz3V7YDYArUGJdTCwOdw8wCbGqaGSAkZixQ=; b=fHH33G+f+Ck58QS+iQfleVXN7qa9tgveGbAqSMLrZe8EZsk4irubBcc7vHwlsRsOWc nKXrrZ31v/dsFEN+uEVo+AG6EtG2x/n5BctvY3cWEqpnnqQldmaoVyQ0zBPdr3tpk1IK W9gYKdG9svPGIgfNLw5TcuXfLWGjM6j5Zb1vdQ9cAuONuQdkIz6dK5JDRPckeWrDXBXP ur2/Ln1vMPGkZ9PxNHHyfr6hK647/vD4vapw4+6LlgJp07ZQRjbN6ZfgFVO3GzEw0fZz 61BzsUL8ICOGmcRIfr4008fgKi0/4W5eUzapKkJtCIspnnwZHKs2BpO3wl61HbHT4e6c 3R8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1782411146; x=1783015946; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1mmqybtyyz3V7YDYArUGJdTCwOdw8wCbGqaGSAkZixQ=; b=Yg7Lp0tozWswR1fFTCrjLnsLQoxzjkN36GQ5GAnMtvN/QhdMVDS4LEGk5T47H9sTD6 TQym5Ecriu257ExVmoaizlb7+RuArCl0MeTgRGSbKMzc2I5TNuYXGMSsATZdR+IUSSRu rZsme3SMn20sf9xmTTsVBez6rhnvEqZ/GJSUOTiLD1ukuFBwnbQ0c01OkjXro+36yrBu zrnHuVbBFOnvbFjC/kqUKn0f1pb5DVcHY7eVe6yTQ44cyQs253W4LyfCGGmT5DbOXMyo rowGEAadoirxUThzF8P8UT64ThaqZSUqjT6FIH5lUYEOZFluLcnCUChPpcO11YD3SFcO YyIQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Rr3msO05bPRelG4WgE8cTmgDVX305YHE9jWwPW8AijE64Gb1rRi67pIyNXUGpDFtuFmT2BUgvNDH1E=@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxFmEtIH3c1H25mhOKK/JJVhBKP+Gnnywc0mhWs2/nDEi+o1SFG ye31NOcUgeMAjQ+VinfC5ltj+f9yzuM6vvpNNrP3C7dbticnFEQCKPByJNtiriI6roDV46uPrUp zL3DEJg== X-Received: from plsd11.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:902:b70b:b0:2bf:195a:2b9d]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:903:1a86:b0:2c2:dadd:940 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2c7fc75a039mr38047275ad.2.1782411145490; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:12:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20260527-kvm-locking-docs-v1-3-4fe8b602ff47@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: loongarch@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20260527-kvm-locking-docs-v1-0-4fe8b602ff47@google.com> <20260527-kvm-locking-docs-v1-3-4fe8b602ff47@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/12] Documentation: KVM: Consolidate notes about kvm->slots_lock and irq_lock From: Sean Christopherson To: Ackerley Tng Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Tianrui Zhao , Bibo Mao , Huacai Chen , WANG Xuerui , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Fuad Tabba , vannapurve@google.com, x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wed, May 27, 2026, Ackerley Tng wrote: > Move the detail about ordering between kvm->slots_lock and kvm->irq_lock to > where the two locks are first mentioned. Why?