From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Sam Li <faithilikerun@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
dlemoal@kernel.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/5] virtio-blk: do not merge writes across a zone boundary
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:44:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aj5mCUdALSdJUdCL@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623184830.373232-4-faithilikerun@gmail.com>
Hello Sam,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 08:48:28PM +0200, Sam Li wrote:
> virtio_blk_submit_multireq() fuses adjacent in-zone writes into a
> single request. On a zoned backend, a merged zone append request
> that straddles a zone boundary is rejected by the device because
> each write must stay within a single zone.
>
> Add a bail condition to the merge coalescer: if combining the
> candidate request into the current batch would cross a zone
> boundary, flush the current batch and start a new one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Li <faithilikerun@gmail.com>
> ---
> block/block-backend.c | 11 +++++++++++
> hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/system/block-backend-io.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c
> index 37ba7e9fc4..049e70ddcb 100644
> --- a/block/block-backend.c
> +++ b/block/block-backend.c
> @@ -2326,6 +2326,17 @@ uint32_t blk_get_request_alignment(BlockBackend *blk)
> return bs ? bs->bl.request_alignment : BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Returns the zone size in bytes for a zoned backend, or 0 if @blk does
> + * not present zoned geometry.
> + */
> +uint64_t blk_get_zone_size(BlockBackend *blk)
> +{
> + BlockDriverState *bs = blk_bs(blk);
> + IO_CODE();
> + return bs ? bs->bl.zone_size : 0;
> +}
Personally, I would add this new API in a separate patch, but either way
is fine with me.
> +
> /* Returns the optimal write zeroes alignment, in bytes; guaranteed nonzero */
> uint32_t blk_get_pwrite_zeroes_alignment(BlockBackend *blk)
> {
> diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> index 6b92066aff..39750fa1c0 100644
> --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> @@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ static void virtio_blk_submit_multireq(VirtIOBlock *s, MultiReqBuffer *mrb)
> int i = 0, start = 0, num_reqs = 0, niov = 0, nb_sectors = 0;
> uint32_t max_transfer;
> int64_t sector_num = 0;
> + uint64_t zone_size = blk_get_zone_size(s->blk);
> + bool zone_cross;
> + int64_t zone_sector, end_sector;
>
> if (mrb->num_reqs == 1) {
> submit_requests(s, mrb, 0, 1, -1);
> @@ -309,17 +312,34 @@ static void virtio_blk_submit_multireq(VirtIOBlock *s, MultiReqBuffer *mrb)
> for (i = 0; i < mrb->num_reqs; i++) {
> VirtIOBlockReq *req = mrb->reqs[i];
> if (num_reqs > 0) {
> + zone_cross = false;
> +
> + /*
> + * On zoned backends, a single backend write must not span a zone
> + * boundary. Bail out of merging if combining req into the current
> + * batch would straddle a zone.
> + */
Like Stefan said in v11, as per the virtio spec, this applies to both
reads and writes. The code is doing the right thing, but the comment
should probably be updated to reflect that.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 18:48 [PATCH v12 0/5] Add full zoned storage emulation to the qcow2 driver Sam Li
2026-06-23 18:48 ` [PATCH v12 1/5] docs/qcow2: add the zoned format feature Sam Li
2026-06-23 18:48 ` [PATCH v12 2/5] qcow2: add configurations for zoned format extension Sam Li
2026-06-26 12:26 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-06-23 18:48 ` [PATCH v12 3/5] virtio-blk: do not merge writes across a zone boundary Sam Li
2026-06-24 19:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-06-26 11:44 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-06-26 11:50 ` Sam Li
2026-06-23 18:48 ` [PATCH v12 4/5] qcow2: add zoned emulation capability Sam Li
2026-06-23 18:48 ` [PATCH v12 5/5] iotests: test the zoned format feature for qcow2 file Sam Li
2026-06-26 11:33 ` [PATCH v12 0/5] Add full zoned storage emulation to the qcow2 driver Niklas Cassel
2026-06-26 11:41 ` Sam Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aj5mCUdALSdJUdCL@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=faithilikerun@gmail.com \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pierrick.bouvier@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.