All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/{i915,xe}: add new intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_{enable,disable}()
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:01:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajBaL3rPX6SGsyvK@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a3ab94dda708f809bfbdfbc9034a2d718885f1e.1781527161.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 03:40:46PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add new high-level functions intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable()
> and intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable() to abstract the low-level
> functions intel_display_power_enable() and
> intel_display_power_disable(), respectively.
> 
> The asymmetry in the "runtime pm enable/disable" and "pm runtime
> suspend/etc" naming is intentional, with the latter intended to be
> called from the PM hooks.
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c                  |  4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c             |  8 ++++----
>  4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> index 67f416070fe0..a11186be9756 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> @@ -869,6 +869,16 @@ void intel_display_driver_pm_resume(struct intel_display *display)
>  	intel_display_power_enable(display);
>  }
>  
> +void intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_display *display)
> +{
> +	intel_display_power_enable(display);
> +}
> +
> +void intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(struct intel_display *display)
> +{
> +	intel_display_power_disable(display);
> +}
> +
>  void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_suspend(struct intel_display *display)
>  {
>  	intel_display_power_runtime_suspend(display);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h
> index 1b494337d629..1ae2ad7e95f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ void intel_display_driver_suspend_access(struct intel_display *display);
>  void intel_display_driver_resume_access(struct intel_display *display);
>  bool intel_display_driver_check_access(struct intel_display *display);
>  
> +void intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_display *display);
> +void intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(struct intel_display *display);
> +
>  void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_suspend(struct intel_display *display);
>  void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_suspend_late(struct intel_display *display);
>  void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_resume_early(struct intel_display *display);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> index 01aaa66e7cab..4d01168d37cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int i915_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  	intel_display_driver_register(display);
>  
> -	intel_display_power_enable(display);
> +	intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable(display);
>  	intel_runtime_pm_enable(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
>  
>  	if (i915_switcheroo_register(dev_priv))
> @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static void i915_driver_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	i915_switcheroo_unregister(dev_priv);
>  
>  	intel_runtime_pm_disable(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> -	intel_display_power_disable(display);
> +	intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(display);
>  
>  	intel_display_driver_unregister(display);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> index a5768736dbbc..493e9e09b6c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe)
>  		return;
>  
>  	intel_display_driver_register(display);
> -	intel_display_power_enable(display);
> +	intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable(display);
>  }
>  
>  void xe_display_unregister(struct xe_device *xe)
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ void xe_display_unregister(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
>  		return;
>  
> -	intel_display_power_disable(display);
> +	intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(display);
>  	intel_display_driver_unregister(display);
>  }
>  
> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static void xe_display_enable_d3cold(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	 * We do a lot of poking in a lot of registers, make sure they work
>  	 * properly.
>  	 */
> -	intel_display_power_disable(display);
> +	intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(display);
>  
>  	intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(display);
>  
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void xe_display_disable_d3cold(struct xe_device *xe)
>  
>  	intel_opregion_resume(display);
>  
> -	intel_display_power_enable(display);
> +	intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_enable(display);
>  }
>  
>  void xe_display_pm_runtime_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-15 12:40 [PATCH 0/4] drm/{i915,xe}: unify runtime pm calls Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: add intel_display_driver_pm_runtime*() functions Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/{i915, xe}: add new intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_{enable, disable}() Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 20:01   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-06-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe/display: separate d3cold handling from xe_display_pm_runtime_suspend_late() Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 20:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-06-15 20:34     ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 12:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe/display: unify runtime suspend/resume with i915 for non-d3cold Jani Nikula
2026-06-15 12:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/{i915,xe}: unify runtime pm calls Patchwork
2026-06-15 13:46 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-06-15 14:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-06-15 15:10 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-06-15 19:52 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajBaL3rPX6SGsyvK@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.