Re: _ISOCxx_SOURCE

[Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 979 bytes --]

Hi Joseph,

On 2026-06-15T17:20:17+0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2026, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
> 
> > I was reviewing the feature_test_macros(7) page, and found the
> > documentation of the _ISOC{99,11,23,...}_SOURCE macros to be incorrect.
> > And thinking about fixing that led me to think that the design of those
> > macros is less than ideal.
> 
> Users should normally use -std= options with the compiler to get matching 
> language and library features.  These feature test macros are mainly for 
> niche cases with old compilers.  So I don't think any new user-facing 
> design for them should be added (the C23 and later ones already use the 
> newer __GLIBC_USE style of conditionals in the header implementation).

Makes sense.  Should I document that users should avoid setting them
directly (and that they should use the corresponding compiler flag)?


Have a lovely night!
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]