From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
lance.yang@linux.dev, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
sj@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/kmemleak: stop the task stack scan early when interrupted
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:49:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajEcNBhtMUxI-_TO@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615-kmemleak-stack-resched-v3-2-acecd7d7fd92@debian.org>
On 06/15, Breno Leitao wrote:
>
> scan_block() already checks scan_should_stop() for every pointer and
> bails out of the current block, but the task stack walk cannot tell and
> keeps issuing a separate scan_should_stop() between every task.
>
> Return that status from scan_block() and use it as the task stack loop
> condition, so the walk stops as soon as a scan is interrupted.
>
> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 17:49 [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks Breno Leitao
2026-06-15 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Breno Leitao
2026-06-15 18:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-06-15 18:46 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-06-16 2:31 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-16 9:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-15 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/kmemleak: stop the task stack scan early when interrupted Breno Leitao
2026-06-15 18:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-06-16 9:49 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-06-15 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/kmemleak: stop the per-cpu and struct page scans early too Breno Leitao
2026-06-15 18:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-06-16 10:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-16 12:46 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajEcNBhtMUxI-_TO@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.