From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8496ECD98EE for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZlnl-00067y-1g; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:39:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZlnk-00067q-2j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:39:12 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZlni-0001kM-MV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:39:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1781685550; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qAOYsPnEfkC2AfwO3ap3nCNWqCjKCbjYCFa/O1csnr8=; b=eoujpU230squOqXKOsViPa4RTHfjzMJJ1duvFf1i/wmwMeacrl/Q89NUme1bn4IsFJXmXl shazDPsM7Vl0S1k2fxUJiyCscuLhJv7BQJ9UjXwpbdrf5+5evedWMiLqu7KqpFgGrAmYxO F6cpYg713imqFcCrQIUH01vNqSNJRTU= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-370-cDP5UF5EOAO221aW-pVoGQ-1; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:39:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cDP5UF5EOAO221aW-pVoGQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: cDP5UF5EOAO221aW-pVoGQ_1781685542 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCCCD19539A6; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.44.33.101]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C00D3195419D; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:38:55 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Alistair Francis , BALATON Zoltan , Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= , Fabiano Rosas , Peter Maydell , Warner Losh , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs/devel: relax policy on AI-generated contributions Message-ID: References: <20260529094619.1034458-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <9ad69343-38b5-449c-8d7b-5cbde9d3b72f@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ad69343-38b5-449c-8d7b-5cbde9d3b72f@linux.ibm.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.445, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Am 16.06.2026 um 19:06 hat Christian Borntraeger geschrieben: > Am 29.05.26 um 11:46 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > -Exceptions do not remove the need for authors to comply with all other > > -requirements for contribution. In particular, the "Signed-off-by" > > -label in a patch submission is a statement that the author takes > > -responsibility for the entire contents of the patch, including any parts > > -that were generated or assisted by AI tools or other tools. > > +.. code-block:: none > > + > > + AI-used-for: tests, docs > > + AI-used-for: code > > + AI-used-for: code (refactoring) > > + AI-used-for: code (prototype) > > + AI-used-for: research > > + > > +``AI-used-for`` should not be included for "background" usage such as > > +autocomplete or obtaining a pre-review of the patch. > > So what about using AI for security scanning? So how do we want to treat > a patch from a human that is based on an AI report. > And if ok, would we then add something like > > Reported-by: Claude, chatgpt whatever? I think it's effectively the same as Coverity, which we don't acknowledge with a Reported-by tag, though we often mention it in the commit message text. The same practice would make sense to me here. (Though of course for Coverity, we have the CID, which obviously doesn't exist for things found with a one-off LLM run, so there is some difference there.) Kevin