From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61F1BCD98E2 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZlya-0000WU-5Z; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:50:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZlyS-0000Vv-Oq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:50:16 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZlyQ-000462-Tr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:50:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1781686213; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=0TuvXh32JzksEUSlQUvK3D1vIGlSFFeEb9OZxFFXSfE=; b=BZhToLL0DVh7rsgA8mACCa84skXjn/H9CfERSw5lQC2R81Wx+24LhXspmOfLC6eC0dYSRZ 9ycVMLHGdSg/jlhnmgcBsz6VHKUbGT9h7KtqAM8XiyvqrfUfASHyuAUd0bUomobjvy4G/M 0qkd797gGbcNJpJtfdqhvn8Ar4JSI1c= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-99-X_Qnpb7sOka_M_ZgsRIfTg-1; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:50:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: X_Qnpb7sOka_M_ZgsRIfTg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: X_Qnpb7sOka_M_ZgsRIfTg_1781686208 Received: from mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.95]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489CA1955DD4; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.44.48.201]) by mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 329CB3189; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 09:49:58 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Christian Borntraeger , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Alistair Francis , BALATON Zoltan , Fabiano Rosas , Peter Maydell , Warner Losh , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs/devel: relax policy on AI-generated contributions Message-ID: References: <20260529094619.1034458-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <9ad69343-38b5-449c-8d7b-5cbde9d3b72f@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.3.2 (2026-04-26) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.6 on 10.30.177.95 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.445, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 10:38:55AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 16.06.2026 um 19:06 hat Christian Borntraeger geschrieben: > > Am 29.05.26 um 11:46 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > > -Exceptions do not remove the need for authors to comply with all other > > > -requirements for contribution. In particular, the "Signed-off-by" > > > -label in a patch submission is a statement that the author takes > > > -responsibility for the entire contents of the patch, including any parts > > > -that were generated or assisted by AI tools or other tools. > > > +.. code-block:: none > > > + > > > + AI-used-for: tests, docs > > > + AI-used-for: code > > > + AI-used-for: code (refactoring) > > > + AI-used-for: code (prototype) > > > + AI-used-for: research > > > + > > > +``AI-used-for`` should not be included for "background" usage such as > > > +autocomplete or obtaining a pre-review of the patch. > > > > So what about using AI for security scanning? So how do we want to treat > > a patch from a human that is based on an AI report. > > And if ok, would we then add something like > > > > Reported-by: Claude, chatgpt whatever? > > I think it's effectively the same as Coverity, which we don't > acknowledge with a Reported-by tag, though we often mention it in the > commit message text. The same practice would make sense to me here. > > (Though of course for Coverity, we have the CID, which obviously doesn't > exist for things found with a one-off LLM run, so there is some > difference there.) Incidentally does any ever find the CID to be useful in the commit message ? With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com ~~ https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :| |: https://libvirt.org ~~ https://entangle-photo.org :| |: https://pixelfed.art/berrange ~~ https://fstop138.berrange.com :|