From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0BACD98E4 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZrWB-0007NV-Lv; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:45:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZrW1-0007EA-0w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:45:19 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZrVw-0005Qw-Vx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:45:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1781707507; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4gF3bJRIhO+0ZTbUwO1neYFBiuuivMGdJ/0Gbdduf5Q=; b=Pwl6jd4f4B06siYtygzTaPWNZrYG5VyRZcKSOtRZQ2d60rOhRCwHlUJ3ptju+6YHFReDGD tGqTH5js2WTc1O/hY7KaD2LEGz6SdXjnsZePEa+TSXWWD2DZa+X/ohR+h4CDQi0d913G1g bjfMqpniWa3sYlvM+LwROPl2AmvL1So= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-364-zKaQhLR_N0ux-HVKzBl1Kg-1; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:45:03 -0400 X-MC-Unique: zKaQhLR_N0ux-HVKzBl1Kg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: zKaQhLR_N0ux-HVKzBl1Kg_1781707502 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE03818005AE; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.44.33.101]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 440463008B3D; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 16:44:54 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= Cc: Christian Borntraeger , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Alistair Francis , BALATON Zoltan , Fabiano Rosas , Peter Maydell , Warner Losh , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs/devel: relax policy on AI-generated contributions Message-ID: References: <20260529094619.1034458-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <9ad69343-38b5-449c-8d7b-5cbde9d3b72f@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.445, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Am 17.06.2026 um 10:49 hat Daniel P. Berrangé geschrieben: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 10:38:55AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 16.06.2026 um 19:06 hat Christian Borntraeger geschrieben: > > > Am 29.05.26 um 11:46 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > > > -Exceptions do not remove the need for authors to comply with all other > > > > -requirements for contribution. In particular, the "Signed-off-by" > > > > -label in a patch submission is a statement that the author takes > > > > -responsibility for the entire contents of the patch, including any parts > > > > -that were generated or assisted by AI tools or other tools. > > > > +.. code-block:: none > > > > + > > > > + AI-used-for: tests, docs > > > > + AI-used-for: code > > > > + AI-used-for: code (refactoring) > > > > + AI-used-for: code (prototype) > > > > + AI-used-for: research > > > > + > > > > +``AI-used-for`` should not be included for "background" usage such as > > > > +autocomplete or obtaining a pre-review of the patch. > > > > > > So what about using AI for security scanning? So how do we want to treat > > > a patch from a human that is based on an AI report. > > > And if ok, would we then add something like > > > > > > Reported-by: Claude, chatgpt whatever? > > > > I think it's effectively the same as Coverity, which we don't > > acknowledge with a Reported-by tag, though we often mention it in the > > commit message text. The same practice would make sense to me here. > > > > (Though of course for Coverity, we have the CID, which obviously doesn't > > exist for things found with a one-off LLM run, so there is some > > difference there.) > > Incidentally does any ever find the CID to be useful in the commit > message ? I've occasionally looked it up during review, but not sure if I ever made use of the permanent record in the git history. Kevin