Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] nfs: Modernize Direct I/O path

[Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>]

On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 07:11:45AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

Hi Christoph,

> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 01:39:53PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > =======
> > This series has been tested with xfstests [2] on RDMA & TCP transports:
> > 
> >  ./check generic/091 generic/130 generic/139 generic/143 generic/154 \
> >          generic/155 generic/183 generic/188 generic/190 generic/196 \
> >          generic/198 generic/203 generic/214 generic/240 generic/263 \
> >          generic/287 generic/290 generic/292 generic/330 generic/444 \
> >          generic/450 generic/451 generic/586 generic/647 generic/708 \
> >          generic/729 generic/760
> 
> Did you only run these tests that previously failed for Anna or all
> of xfstests, which should give you much better coverage?

I highlighted those specific tests in the cover letter as they were
reported as failures for the NFS direct I/O path.

I've also run the full xfstests quick group on both the unpatched and
patched kernels (7.1-rc7) across RDMA and TCP transports. I did not see
any regressions between the two runs, the results were identical across
the quick suite.

I could report the entire run for a patched and unpatched kernel in the
v3 cover letter if you'd like?

Thanks,
Praan