Re: [PATCH] t4216: fix no-op test that breaks TAP output

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 09:29:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
> 
> > Given this and the above, I would probably err on the side of
> > designating this as 'test_lazy_prereq' or otherwise silencing the output
> > of 'test_cmp' so that this does not taint the TAP output.
> 
> We can argue the merit and demerit with a good log message.  The
> central issue at hand is how precious 52a9 in the script lost by
> this patch is (in other words, are we checking more than "is our
> char signed or unsigned?").

Ultimately, I don't mind much which way we go. But if we want to retain
this, would you mind sending a rewritten v2, Taylor? I feel like you're
in a better position to argue why we should retain it.

Thanks!

Patrick