From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: javierm@redhat.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
mripard@kernel.org, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
rayyan@ansari.sh, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/sysfb: simpledrm: Validate mmap size against framebuffer size
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 15:40:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajqMoKhDehM7ejGy@orome> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d162a14b-7432-4d64-9f21-78a1150f9e0c@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2727 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 11:02:39AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 22.06.26 um 18:13 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 03:19:39PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > > The size of the mmap'ed framebuffer could be smaller than the minimum
> > > required framebuffer size. Validate the resource size against the
> > > framebuffer size.
> > >
> > > Buggy firmware that triggers this check should be fixed up with a quirk
> > > on a case-by-case base.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> > > Suggested-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/simpledrm.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/simpledrm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/simpledrm.c
> > > index 76b9a3f5c4ef..a04f0c852ea4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/simpledrm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/simpledrm.c
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > > #include <linux/of_clk.h>
> > > #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > > +#include <linux/overflow.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_data/simplefb.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > #include <linux/pm.h>
> > > @@ -624,6 +625,7 @@ static struct simpledrm_device *simpledrm_device_create(struct drm_driver *drv,
> > > u16 width_mm = 0, height_mm = 0;
> > > struct device_node *panel_node;
> > > const struct drm_format_info *format;
> > > + u64 size;
> > > struct resource *res, *mem = NULL;
> > > struct drm_plane *primary_plane;
> > > struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > > @@ -704,6 +706,15 @@ static struct simpledrm_device *simpledrm_device_create(struct drm_driver *drv,
> > > }
> > > stride = pitch;
> > > }
> > > + if (check_mul_overflow(height, stride, &size)) {
> > > + drm_err(dev, "framebuffer size exceeds maximum\n");
> > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > + }
> > > + size = ALIGN(size, PAGE_SIZE);
> > > + if (size < PAGE_SIZE) {
> > > + drm_err(dev, "framebuffer alignment exceeds maximum\n");
> > That error message doesn't make sense to me. Maybe "framebuffer
> > alignment below minimum", or something along those lines?
>
> This tests that the align operation did not overflow size. The result would
> then be 0. With the earlier patches limiting the height and stride and size
> being of u64, it's not possible any longer, I think. But testing it doesn't
> really cost us much.
>
> What do you think of "aligned framebuffer size exceeds maximum"?
Ah, I misunderstood what the code was doing. Yes, I think that message
makes it a bit clearer what the error is.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-22 13:19 [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/sysfb: simpledrm: Various improvements Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-22 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/sysfb: simpledrm: Improve framebuffer-size validation Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-22 13:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 15:36 ` Thierry Reding
2026-06-22 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/sysfb: simpledrm: Improve panel-size validation Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-22 16:05 ` Thierry Reding
2026-06-23 8:51 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-22 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/sysfb: simpledrm: Inline simplefb_get_validated_int() Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-22 16:06 ` Thierry Reding
2026-06-22 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/sysfb: simpledrm: Improve stride validation Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-22 16:10 ` Thierry Reding
2026-06-23 8:56 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-22 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/sysfb: simpledrm: Validate mmap size against framebuffer size Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-22 13:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 13:47 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-22 16:13 ` Thierry Reding
2026-06-23 9:02 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-23 13:40 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2026-06-22 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/sysfb: simpledrm: Read panel orientation from DT node Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-22 13:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 16:17 ` Thierry Reding
2026-06-23 9:04 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-23 13:43 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajqMoKhDehM7ejGy@orome \
--to=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=rayyan@ansari.sh \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.