From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Kristofer Karlsson <krka@spotify.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] reftable: fix quadratic behavior in the presence of tombstones
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 15:53:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak-n6K4heV2kHviZ@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c13f15ddc20f721443fa1d462ea1b7c2356fbffc.1783598912.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 12:08:31PM +0000, Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget wrote:
> diff --git a/reftable/stack.c b/reftable/stack.c
> index ab12926708..fd7d8f3f1e 100644
> --- a/reftable/stack.c
> +++ b/reftable/stack.c
> @@ -337,7 +337,6 @@ static int reftable_stack_reload_once(struct reftable_stack *st,
> /* Update the stack to point to the new tables. */
> if (st->merged)
> reftable_merged_table_free(st->merged);
> - new_merged->suppress_deletions = 1;
> st->merged = new_merged;
>
> if (st->tables)
Okay, we still retain the field after this patch. But the question is:
how would libgit2 now set it? I think we should rather extend the
`struct reftable_stack_options` so that the caller can control whether
or not to suppress deletions at stack creation time.
Thanks!
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 13:35 [PATCH 0/2] reftable: fix quadratic behavior when re-creating deleted refs Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-07-06 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] t: add tests for ref tombstone scenarios Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-07-07 15:24 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-07 16:12 ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-07-08 5:59 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-08 7:28 ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-07-06 13:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] reftable: fix quadratic behavior when re-creating deleted refs Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-07-07 15:24 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-07 16:04 ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-07-08 11:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] " brian m. carlson
2026-07-09 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 " Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-07-09 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t/perf: add perf test for ref tombstone scenarios Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-07-09 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] reftable: fix quadratic behavior in the presence of tombstones Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-07-09 13:53 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-07-09 14:48 ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-07-09 14:54 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-10 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] reftable: fix quadratic behavior when re-creating deleted refs Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-07-10 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] t/perf: add perf test for ref tombstone scenarios Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-07-10 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] reftable: fix quadratic behavior in the presence of tombstones Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-07-10 14:32 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-10 15:03 ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-07-13 5:14 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak-n6K4heV2kHviZ@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=krka@spotify.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.