From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB70C48124C; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 19:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783451237; cv=none; b=VDs5E0sLTjY3tw3nb9VthsvQgGKoxQ4OERXSUx5r78Tyog9FEnXBePCbR0IlKvdEBAKi9Y2l1L50R6JmsGPM3uucbEsUoQySGqtaGPeabNHAGLwDFgoambW8csZ0hC4hcoST5SMIfCrUD6Wv2IB1NTkx2LdqDw0nFfvKtqzjWR0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783451237; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yoI/lWG3IaiJYnLbL4tKGnfBEvvYFR60uqX9ZISZsiE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YmrQvq29AEdP/2KF2Owuyvm8as85SD59LSWKZq8QS13Wr3L6TPlhqAWlHbp2rDovVcNmKovXIWyVtNao8CthX4vKZl6KKIgRQOFuk+dSk7Rpz8J7sGxeuGxtQciej3Ea0EnkJW5RNpaQ0zcwuV7cbZPPYNRmOfVAmCWDxPOrNWU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Z7M7coxi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Z7M7coxi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 089A31F00A3A; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 19:07:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783451229; bh=2uavOVc6+8bx0x/e4wZ300EwXCUUBjrmxoMJ45v7fLk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Z7M7coxi3PyFG5acZwSagsmFgv+MMGomOIBe9pN+8QhVg5zqd1iQIS2mdZ3V7XrwR RSsC1kRLEXRcvgpMPVSTFC4zny8Xu6kvSxdMjKHgfN4+jHvtAcxXIhly9pDvLVbm0D BXLvCX0OW9kBl0Qz4ik+pst/1ngHq8vh+ivXHP7GMeKEAt2fxaiOYW981y2WSXE6gY lgs0Ey9IW1iAIVZao0c4WawG8PzjgDrQBEoZyxYfBRb7tD0WNROAhZMr7fTqFU9mO+ kXGf/xfymyBCuNvIunxYukngVX3A1wUibO52GyMqRj6EL+ZmJkjkwQipmCqlHN9mjf i4X1j6GKcZs2w== Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 20:06:56 +0100 From: Lorenzo Stoakes To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Christian Brauner , Laurent Pinchart , "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" , Boris Burkov , Jeff Layton , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Justin Stitt , Carlos Maiolino , Jakub Kicinski , Jori Koolstra , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Brian Foster , Christoph Hellwig , David Disseldorp , Mark Brown , Jani Nikula , Jens Axboe , Vlastimil Babka , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove the requirement for LLM attribution Message-ID: References: <20260703163251.GB3734786@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <0ba6bf66-e48f-40df-a953-503d317b3dbe@kernel.org> <20260707124031.GC211515@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260707141803.GA254690@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260707-siebzehn-geleast-gastmahl-4889a8f6b474@brauner> <20260707-impfschutz-lerngruppen-klubhaus-7aabcc82f3b4@brauner> <878q7mr59k.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878q7mr59k.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 01:03:51PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Christian Brauner writes: > > >> Then someone can basically just merge the original patch I sent since > >> everyone seems to agree on that front. And then the extension to include > >> how the LLM was used can be discussed in a separate patch. > > > > https://patch.msgid.link/20260701-work-coding-assistants-v1-1-a20a94d1d606@kernel.org > > I still have it around :) I can apply it if that's truly the > consensus... I'll confess to having not entirely kept up with the > conversation over the holiday weekend, though, and needing to review > things. > > If you object, do let me know. I think we need the commit message to be a cleaned up a little :) Also good to have it out there non-RFC so people know it's actually a contender for merge. So I think Christian should send a fresh non-RFC version of that with an updated commit msg + with the people here cc'd, and I'm fine with that patch going in as it is (I already gave a tag). We can always follw up with the comment stuff later (which I consider _really_ important but one thing at a time). > > Thanks, > > jon Cheers, Lorenzo