Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] iio: health: add MAX86150 ECG and PPG biosensor driver

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>]

On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 03:54:19PM +0300, Md Shofiqul Islam wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> I want to address your concern directly and honestly.
> 
> I did use AI tools during this development, primarily to understand
> kernel conventions and check my code against subsystem patterns. The
> implementation decisions and the responsibility for what I submitted
> are mine. I should have disclosed this from the start, and I did not.
> I apologize for that.

Yes, we have a tag for that Assisted-by.

> Regarding types.h: Your feedback was not ignored. As a new contributor
> managing feedback from multiple reviewers across nine versions in
> overlapping threads, I lost track of your comment from v4. When
> Sashiko flagged HIGH severity issues, I panicked and sent new versions
> too quickly without properly reading all outstanding comments. That
> was a mistake in my process and entirely my responsibility.
> 
> I am committed to contributing properly to this community. All
> outstanding comments, including types.h, array_size.h, and err.h, are
> addressed in v10. I will not send another version until I've read and
> addressed every open comment from every reviewer.
> 
> Thank you for the direct feedback. I understand why you raised it.

Thank you for following the suggestions!

P.S. Please, do not top-post.

> On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 6:15 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 02:05:45PM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote:
> > > On Tue,  7 Jul 2026 14:27:14 +0300
> > > Md Shofiqul Islam <shofiqtest@gmail.com> wrote:

...

> > > You're missing array_size.h, err.h, types.h
> >
> > My comment against types.h was ignored. I think that this contribution is
> > heavily assisted by AI (which has to be mentioned), otherwise I can not
> > explain such an ignorance and mistakes from a human.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko