From: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Optimize S2 page splitting
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 16:25:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak5r73cHx36SP0-O@LeoBrasDK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708134101.2514759-1-leo.bras@arm.com>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 02:40:56PM +0100, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> While playing with dirty-bit tracking, I decided to take a look on how page
> splitting works. Found out all entries are walked, even though we can infer,
> for instance that:
> - If a level-3 entry is walked, it means the parent level-2 entry is split
> - If a split just succeeded in an table entry, it means all children nodes
> are already split
>
> This patches' idea is to introduce new walking flags to skip pagetable
> levels 0-3.
>
> The idea of skipping child nodes was also tested, but it was marginally
> slower than just skipping levels, so it was discarted.
>
> Optimization measured on two scenarios involving eager-splitting on a
> VM with 32 memslot of 2GB (total 64GB), and vcpu per slot:
> - Scenario 1: No manual protect, whole memslot split at dirty-track enable
> (KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 ioctl with KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES)
> - Split happens only once, whole region
> - Evalutes improved batch performance of splitting
> - Scenario 2: Manual protect, split happens during every dirty-bit clean
> (KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG ioctl), average for 2 iterations.
> - Split called multiple times, for smaller 64-page sections.
> - Evaluate improved performance for multiple calls
>
> Scenario 1, improvement on dirty-track enable ioctl for the memslot:
> - Memory was already split (4k pages): -43.18% runtime (stdev 3.87%)
> - THP backed memory: -25.77% runtime (stdev 1.01%)
> - 64x1GB hugetlb memory: -25.62% runtime (stdev 1.09%)
>
> Scenario 2, improvement on dirty-log clean ioctl for the memslot:
> - Memory was already split (4k pages): -39.88% runtime (stdev 2.71%)
> - THP backed memory: -25.18% runtime (stdev 0.32%)
> - 64x1GB hugetlb memory: -49.17% runtime (stdev 1.86%)
>
> For collecting above numbers, the following script was ran in both vanilla
> and patched kernels, with kernel parameter 'default_hugepagesz=1G', on an
> TX2 with 128GB RAM.
>
> --- dirty_test.sh
> #!/bin/bash
> filename=$(uname -r |cut -d'-' -f 4-)
>
> run_test(){
> base_test="./dirty_log_perf_test -b 2G -v 32 -m 6 -m 8"
>
> # Manual cleaning disable
> ${base_test} -g
> ${base_test} -g -s anonymous_thp
> echo 64 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
> ${base_test} -g -s shared_hugetlb
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
>
> # Manual cleaning enable
> ${base_test}
> ${base_test} -s anonymous_thp
> echo 64 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
> ${base_test} -s shared_hugetlb
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
> }
>
> run_test 2>&1 | tee ${filename}
> ---
>
> Above dirty_log_perf_test command is the standard kvm selftest found in the
> kernel tree. It tested the following guest modes:
> Testing guest mode: PA-bits:40, VA-bits:48, 4K pages
> Testing guest mode: PA-bits:40, VA-bits:48, 64K pages
> (Modes with PA-bits:36 were discarted in this version, given the amount
> of RAM being used for testing, and the similarity of previous results)
>
> Performance numbers from above modes were used to calculate average and
> stdev showed in the optimization results.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Rebased on top of v7.2-rc1
> - Improved testing, added more memory, re-tested
> - Now: 32 vcpus @ total of 64G
> - Before: 1cpu @ 16G
v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260618131447.764085-1-leo.bras@arm.com/
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Fixed inverted flag verification priority (Sashiko)
> - Fixed incorrectly skipping POST call if level was skipped (Sashiko), and to that
> - New pre-patch that changes goto-out -> return to avoid re-testing walk_continue
> v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260610202112.2695205-2-leo.bras@arm.com/
>
> Changes since RFC:
> - Changed approach from return value to walk flags (Will Deacon)
> - Discarted skip_child approach (Oliver Upton)
> - Measured in real hardware, and from userspace perspective (Marc Zyngier)
> - Better explanation of what and how numbers were collected
> RFC Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260515195904.2466381-1-leo.bras@arm.com/
>
> Thanks!
> Leo
>
>
> Leonardo Bras (3):
> KVM: arm64: Avoid re-testing walk_continue
> KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_LEVEL* walk flags
> KVM: arm64: Make stage2_split_walker() skip unnecessary walks
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: dc59e4fea9d83f03bad6bddf3fa2e52491777482
> --
> 2.55.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 13:40 [PATCH v3 0/3] Optimize S2 page splitting Leonardo Bras
2026-07-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: arm64: Avoid re-testing walk_continue Leonardo Bras
2026-07-08 16:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-08 17:00 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_LEVEL* walk flags Leonardo Bras
2026-07-08 13:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:49 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-08 16:16 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-08 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-09 14:25 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-11 5:53 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-13 10:14 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-14 5:41 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-14 10:13 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: arm64: Make stage2_split_walker() skip unnecessary walks Leonardo Bras
2026-07-08 15:25 ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2026-07-12 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Optimize S2 page splitting Dev Jain
2026-07-13 10:08 ` Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak5r73cHx36SP0-O@LeoBrasDK \
--to=leo.bras@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.