From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Norbert Szetei <norbert@doyensec.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>,
Taegu Ha <hataegu0826@gmail.com>,
Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ppp: defer channel free to an RCU grace period to fix pppol2tp RX UAF
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 06:15:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akUSFR-ih9U27fgr@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C954A7EA-AA98-4E3C-80B5-42C34B3183A3@doyensec.com>
On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 02:14:39PM +0200, Norbert Szetei wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
> index 57c68efa5ff8..cb8fe37170d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ struct channel {
> struct list_head clist; /* link in list of channels per unit */
> spinlock_t upl; /* protects `ppp' and 'bridge' */
> struct channel __rcu *bridge; /* "bridged" ppp channel */
> + struct rcu_head rcu; /* for RCU-deferred free of the channel */
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPP_MULTILINK
> u8 avail; /* flag used in multilink stuff */
> u8 had_frag; /* >= 1 fragments have been sent */
> @@ -3583,7 +3584,7 @@ static void ppp_release_channel(struct channel *pch)
> }
> skb_queue_purge(&pch->file.xq);
> skb_queue_purge(&pch->file.rq);
> - kfree(pch);
> + kfree_rcu(pch, rcu);
Why not use kfree_rcu_mightsleep() instead? That would eliminate the need
for the additional `struct rcu_head rcu;` field.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 12:14 [PATCH net] ppp: defer channel free to an RCU grace period to fix pppol2tp RX UAF Norbert Szetei
2026-07-01 13:15 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-07-01 18:00 ` Norbert Szetei
2026-07-01 13:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-01 18:03 ` Norbert Szetei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akUSFR-ih9U27fgr@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hataegu0826@gmail.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=norbert@doyensec.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.