From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
Felix Abecassis <fabecassis@nvidia.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kmemleak: sched_domain_shared leaked on asymmetric-capacity + SCHED_CACHE
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 09:19:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akfg6wBsfORgYhTQ@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73685ae1-6d90-4799-a1d7-08a1fcf24b8b@amd.com>
Hello Prateek,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 04:05:59PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> On 7/3/2026 3:52 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > On current linux-next (CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE=y) we hit a kmemleak on an
> > arm64 box with asymmetric CPU capacity, triggered by a cpuset-driven
> > sched-domain rebuild:
> >
> > kmemleak: unreferenced object 0xffff000100c95e80 (size 32):
> > comm "kworker/22:1", pid 407, jiffies 4294669077
> > hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> > 48 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 H...H....... ...
> > backtrace (crc ec5d7053):
> > __kmalloc_cache_node_noprof
> > build_sched_domains
> > partition_sched_domains
> > rebuild_sched_domains_locked
> > rebuild_sched_domains
> > process_scheduled_works
> > kthread
> > ret_from_fork
> > kmemleak: 1 new suspected memory leaks
> >
> > The leaked object is a struct sched_domain_shared (32 bytes with
> > CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE) allocated in __sds_alloc(), inlined into
> > build_sched_domains()
> >
> > Is this a known issue?
>
> It is theoretically possible but there is a defensive WARN_ON()
> in topology code that you should have hit first. Do you see any
> other warning?
>
> If it is not too much trouble, could you add "sched_verbose"
> to your kernel cmdline (or do
> echo Y > /sys/kernel/debug/sched/verbose) and redo this cpuset
> that leaks the data and share the dmesg. It should give some clue
> what the topology looks like that causes this.
Sure, does this one help:
bash-5.1# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
unreferenced object 0xffff0000c1180820 (size 32):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294667323
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
08 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 ............ ...
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace (crc f4478cb7):
kmemleak_alloc+0x44/0xd8
__kmalloc_cache_node_noprof+0x344/0x5d8
build_sched_domains+0x2f8/0x2110
sched_init_domains+0xec/0x160
sched_init_smp+0x48/0x108
kernel_init_freeable+0x140/0x200
kernel_init+0x30/0x170
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
bash-5.1# cd /sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/
bash-5.1# grep . -r *
cpu0/domain0/level:1
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain0/name:MC
cpu0/domain0/cache_nice_tries:1
cpu0/domain0/imbalance_pct:117
cpu0/domain0/busy_factor:16
cpu0/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:2127
cpu0/domain0/max_interval:16
cpu0/domain0/min_interval:8
cpu1/domain0/level:1
cpu1/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu1/domain0/name:MC
cpu1/domain0/cache_nice_tries:1
cpu1/domain0/imbalance_pct:117
cpu1/domain0/busy_factor:16
cpu1/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:18112
cpu1/domain0/max_interval:16
cpu1/domain0/min_interval:8
cpu2/domain0/level:1
cpu2/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu2/domain0/name:MC
cpu2/domain0/cache_nice_tries:1
cpu2/domain0/imbalance_pct:117
cpu2/domain0/busy_factor:16
cpu2/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:3147
cpu2/domain0/max_interval:16
cpu2/domain0/min_interval:8
cpu3/domain0/level:1
cpu3/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu3/domain0/name:MC
cpu3/domain0/cache_nice_tries:1
cpu3/domain0/imbalance_pct:117
cpu3/domain0/busy_factor:16
cpu3/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:16399
cpu3/domain0/max_interval:16
cpu3/domain0/min_interval:8
cpu4/domain0/level:1
cpu4/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu4/domain0/name:MC
cpu4/domain0/cache_nice_tries:1
cpu4/domain0/imbalance_pct:117
cpu4/domain0/busy_factor:16
cpu4/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:27180
cpu4/domain0/max_interval:16
cpu4/domain0/min_interval:8
cpu5/domain0/level:1
cpu5/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu5/domain0/name:MC
cpu5/domain0/cache_nice_tries:1
cpu5/domain0/imbalance_pct:117
cpu5/domain0/busy_factor:16
cpu5/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:18384
cpu5/domain0/max_interval:16
cpu5/domain0/min_interval:8
cpu6/domain0/level:1
cpu6/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu6/domain0/name:MC
cpu6/domain0/cache_nice_tries:1
cpu6/domain0/imbalance_pct:117
cpu6/domain0/busy_factor:16
cpu6/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:16261
cpu6/domain0/max_interval:16
cpu6/domain0/min_interval:8
cpu7/domain0/level:1
cpu7/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu7/domain0/name:MC
cpu7/domain0/cache_nice_tries:1
cpu7/domain0/imbalance_pct:117
cpu7/domain0/busy_factor:16
cpu7/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:7780
cpu7/domain0/max_interval:16
cpu7/domain0/min_interval:8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-09 18:07 [PATCH v6 0/5 RESEND] sched/fair: SMT-aware asymmetric CPU capacity Andrea Righi
2026-05-09 18:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Drop redundant RCU read lock in NOHZ kick path Andrea Righi
2026-05-11 13:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-15 6:49 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-16 5:45 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-16 17:15 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-20 8:34 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Andrea Righi
2026-05-21 19:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Marek Szyprowski
2026-05-21 20:13 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-09 18:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Attach sched_domain_shared to sd_asym_cpucapacity Andrea Righi
2026-05-11 13:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-15 10:05 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-16 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 " Andrea Righi
2026-05-16 17:19 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-18 20:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-18 21:31 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-19 5:52 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-19 6:43 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-19 7:47 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-19 7:54 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-19 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-19 11:27 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-19 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-25 8:30 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-20 8:34 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-03 10:22 ` kmemleak: sched_domain_shared leaked on asymmetric-capacity + SCHED_CACHE Breno Leitao
2026-07-03 10:35 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-03 16:19 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-07-04 6:16 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-06 14:38 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-07-07 4:11 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-07 13:31 ` Breno Leitao
2026-07-07 13:59 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-07 15:31 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-05-09 18:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Prefer fully-idle SMT cores in asym-capacity idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-05-11 13:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-11 13:45 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-11 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 " Andrea Righi
2026-05-20 8:34 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Andrea Righi
2026-05-09 18:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Reject misfit pulls onto busy SMT siblings on asym-capacity Andrea Righi
2026-05-11 13:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-15 10:09 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-16 9:04 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-20 8:34 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Andrea Righi
2026-05-09 18:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Add SIS_UTIL support to select_idle_capacity() Andrea Righi
2026-05-11 13:08 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-20 8:34 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akfg6wBsfORgYhTQ@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=fabecassis@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.