From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD042DDC5 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2026 10:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783159455; cv=none; b=gjNV3WlCE3vcBKRuiJ5SR1odFAFE61lIEosWozWBYWCW+Rj+ztRZn2eNnuPEQt/MfizD3suPBFXV7/a3XQSRo5bSQzLTFZAIgEf82w0A1LpWKIKNJvrIliSB7nmw5uihYo+DYLdXGqNNYohcWSEgK+snl7Seb0zvThRAc1MZt1g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783159455; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6R81oEXqkneXDwQkGdWzz9dzRDKmRG83CV5f3RL5B6I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ryBncYybq+nK7YCxAb971l9Vir19ctF2P9fq+TWgaTLqRkGto43DslKMinaxIznkk4+m0ZpuD5/w+eHDu5GHADndrpMD9N+IFcVshi98NtaNQxkgvHR2xo51vHhTJ97HWN5WUJT4pcqdv32kp6R1IAV+9ygNnL6JkUE99NJ0GS0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UxoHJZwp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UxoHJZwp" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DEBA1F000E9; Sat, 4 Jul 2026 10:04:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783159454; bh=KbHzIWrPYpX4m4Z0NL+ODodGPfn2TyzbWTx1+qVPiOU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=UxoHJZwpN/Dhv5pFptb4o2RUXH763dJbi5BKR5Nj631HZO5RdRcjY+LmussJc+bU0 R2enKPHE/+wAlxyq6LU1Pg353yo3vlhj9515zgRqLc2uI7ayOrWB8iOdWOuwNPby6W n6i+4IxpbeEWmK5vLrqIxXs5R2bjnonBvNaUM5dYAiYyDqBqxwsJjBRg7h2pexeiuL mg2daw2d3mVUgiFxilbNpDNgwip58ikJKGuc33EBP6Cf50kalsd9wyaXdcyMcPHiKG xwzCetNHGTUqh+Zz432FRl1j2IArbSmpXqjDKbCFwShWtNr+oHB4+euOJ7Vtm0BQNf yYnxqHhodaonw== Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2026 13:04:02 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: SJ Park Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes , Andrew Morton , Usama Arif , david@kernel.org, chrisl@kernel.org, kasong@tencent.com, ziy@nvidia.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, Baoquan He , willy@infradead.org, youngjun.park@lge.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, alex@ghiti.fr, kas@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org, dev.jain@arm.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, npache@redhat.com, "Liam R. Howlett" , ryan.roberts@arm.com, Vlastimil Babka , lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nphamcs@gmail.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm: preparatory patches for PMD level swap entries Message-ID: References: <20260703194502.102044-1-sj@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260703194502.102044-1-sj@kernel.org> Hi SJ, On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 12:45:01PM -0700, SJ Park wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:08:03 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > CI grabs patches from patchwork and tries to apply them to one of the three > > bases: mm-unstable, mm-new or the latest Linus' commit merged into mm.git. > > > > If patches apply, the other bases are not checked. > > > > This patches applied cleanly to mm-unstable and successfully passed (at > > least once :) ) > > https://github.com/linux-mm/linux-mm/actions/runs/28544575927/ > > Awesome! > > I found the CI script (mm-ci) on the GitHub organization. Is the repo open to > contributions? Yes :) > If so, between GitHub PR and patches to linux-mm@ what is more > preferred? The way it works, all testing update should go to mm-ci. There is a bot that takes them from there and generates PRs inn linux-mm that include patches and the CI files. > Seems it is not running DAMON specific tests, and I want to add > DAMON kunit test to the test set as a first step (DAMO selftest is bit flaky on > some systems), if people don't mind. Patches are welcome :) If DAMON selftest is flaky let's keep it out for now please, otherwise it would cause too much noise. > I or someone else may also want to add more tests like Cc list checking [1] in > future. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260703190421.100480-1-sj@kernel.org Yeah, I think it would be helpful. > Thanks, > SJ -- Sincerely yours, Mike.