All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Akihiko Odaki <odaki@rsg.ci.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@daynix.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] KVM: arm64: PMU: Use multiple host PMUs
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 01:10:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aky0abet4NfzK4z8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86bjcjp6x1.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 08:58:50AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2026 19:28:20 +0100,
> Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 07:03:23PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> > > Akihiko Odaki (7):
> > >       KVM: arm64: Disallow vPMU when pPMUs do not cover all CPUs
> > >       KVM: arm64: PMU: Protect the list of PMUs with RCU
> > >       KVM: arm64: PMU: Pass the pPMU to kvm_map_pmu_event()
> > >       KVM: arm64: PMU: Pass the target CPU to kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu()
> > >       KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement fixed-counters-only emulation
> > >       KVM: arm64: PMU: Introduce FIXED_COUNTERS_ONLY
> > >       KVM: arm64: selftests: Test PMU_V3_FIXED_COUNTERS_ONLY
> > 
> > Thanks for respinning the series, I left some comments. I'd really like
> > to get this feature picked up, hope you have cycles to work on it soon.
> > 
> > FWIW, we're considering adding a new vCPU feature flag to deprecate all
> > the ugliness of the old PMUv3 UAPI. I'm tempted to say that the
> > FIXED_COUNTERS_ONLY feature is conditioned on the new feature flag...
> 
> It'd be good to have a strawman proposal on the list if we are going
> to change add a new API, specially if this is likely to gate new code.
> 

Patch 1 [*] of the series I linked does exactly this, no? Needs some
attention like a KVM_CAP to make the bit discoverable by the VMM but
gets the general idea across.

[*]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20260702190421.420992-2-congkai@amazon.com/

Thanks,
Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06 10:03 [PATCH v8 0/7] KVM: arm64: PMU: Use multiple host PMUs Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 10:03 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] KVM: arm64: Disallow vPMU when pPMUs do not cover all CPUs Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 17:04   ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-07 11:08     ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 10:03 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] KVM: arm64: PMU: Protect the list of PMUs with RCU Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 10:03 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] KVM: arm64: PMU: Pass the pPMU to kvm_map_pmu_event() Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 10:03 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] KVM: arm64: PMU: Pass the target CPU to kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu() Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 10:03 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement fixed-counters-only emulation Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 10:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 18:23   ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-07 11:23     ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-07 12:52       ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 10:03 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] KVM: arm64: PMU: Introduce FIXED_COUNTERS_ONLY Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 11:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:58   ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-07 11:36     ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 10:03 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test PMU_V3_FIXED_COUNTERS_ONLY Akihiko Odaki
2026-07-06 18:28 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] KVM: arm64: PMU: Use multiple host PMUs Oliver Upton
2026-07-07  7:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-07  8:10     ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2026-07-07  9:41       ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aky0abet4NfzK4z8@kernel.org \
    --to=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devel@daynix.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=odaki@rsg.ci.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.