All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
To: "Derek J. Clark" <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>
Cc: Manish Khadka <maskmemanish@gmail.com>,
	dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>,
	Lee Jones <joneslee@google.com>,
	Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: hid-lenovo-go: cancel cfg_setup work in hid_go_cfg_remove()
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 11:06:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <akzBhKTOVpaTb4nT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515182347.6C82FC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org>

Hello Derek and Mark!

May I please draw your attention to this issue in the hid-lenovo drivers,
which was pointed out by Sashiko:


On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 06:23:46PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 7 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Critical] Hardware state corruption and crashes due to use of a static global struct for device data.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c b/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c
> > index d4d26c7833563..b9d8cde531365 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c
> > @@ -2408,6 +2408,15 @@ static int hid_go_cfg_probe(struct hid_device *hdev,
> >  
> >  static void hid_go_cfg_remove(struct hid_device *hdev)
> >  {
> > +	/*
> > +	 * cfg_setup is scheduled from hid_go_cfg_probe() with a 2 ms delay
> > +	 * and dereferences drvdata.hdev.  Drain it here before tearing
> > +	 * down so the workqueue cannot run after hid_destroy_device()'s
> > +	 * put_device() has released the underlying hdev and dereference
> > +	 * a stale drvdata.hdev pointer.
> > +	 */
> > +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&drvdata.go_cfg_setup);
> 
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the driver use a global
> static variable (static struct hid_go_cfg drvdata) to store device state?
> 
> A second device probe would unconditionally overwrite drvdata.hdev and
> re-initialize both drvdata.cfg_mutex and drvdata.go_cfg_setup.
> 
> Re-initializing an active mutex destroys its wait lists, and re-initializing
> an active delayed work overwrites its linked list pointers, leading to
> immediate memory corruption and kernel panics.
> 
> Should the device state be dynamically allocated per-instance instead?


This is the same issue which was also introduced in hid-oxp, which I
pointed out in [1].  As the review-bot points out above, while the data in
your static drvdata variable is maybe only necessary once (but that
also seems questionable?), I think the mutex and workqueue shouldn't
just get re-initialized in the middle of being used, when a second device is
plugged in and the probe() hook runs again.

This pattern is used in both the drivers hid-lenovo-go.c, hid-lenovo-go-s.c,
as well as in the newer hid-oxp discussed in [1].

Shouldn't the drvdata just be allocated with one of the devm_*alloc() variants
as in the other drivers?

—Günther


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/akfGTjId84EjV141@google.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-15 15:36 [PATCH] HID: hid-lenovo-go: cancel cfg_setup work in hid_go_cfg_remove() Manish Khadka
2026-05-15 16:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 17:45   ` [PATCH v2] " Manish Khadka
2026-05-15 18:23     ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  9:06       ` Günther Noack [this message]
2026-07-07 15:19         ` Derek J. Clark
2026-05-25  3:09 ` [PATCH] " Derek J. Clark
2026-06-03 12:19 ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=akzBhKTOVpaTb4nT@google.com \
    --to=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
    --cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joneslee@google.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maskmemanish@gmail.com \
    --cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.