Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ASoC: SDCA: Populate IRQ data earlier

[Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>]

On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 04:44:08PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 7/20/26 16:37, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 10:42:46PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >> On 7/16/26 16:26, Charles Keepax wrote:
> >>> Currently, the IRQ data (attached Entity/Control/etc) is populated
> >>> as the IRQ is requested. However, this can cause issues as
> >>> occasionally the setup process wants to access specifics of
> >>> an IRQ before the IRQ is actually enabled. To facilitate this
> >>> cache all the IRQ data during sdca_irq_populate_early() and make
> >>> sdca_irq_populate() simply request the outstanding IRQs. This
> >>> also has the advantage that sdca_irq_populate() can now just
> >>> iterate through the IRQ array which is much smaller/faster than
> >>> going through every Entity in the Function for Controls.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> I may be splitting hair but shouldn't this patch be moved
> >> earlier?patch1/3-4 seem to be completely tied with the introduction and
> >> use of the fixup_controls() callback, I am not sure I see the link with
> >> the IRQ stuff. Or conversely move this last if this makes more sense.
> > 
> > It can be moved to the start of the series, probably not worth a
> > spin on its own but if we end up with changes from Mark's
> > comments I will do so.
> > 
> > This is slightly related though as sdca_jack_set_jack is called
> > before all the controls are registered and we populate the jack
> > masks in there, so moving the IRQs to later means we need that
> > information ready at that time which this accomplishes. Although
> > it does also just generally make things a bit neater.
> > 
> >> Also while I am at it, I wouldn't hurt to have an explanation of the
> >> races conditions earlier, it's only in patch3 that the race condition is
> >> described in details.
> > 
> > Yeah I should have probably included that in the cover letter
> > more. Likewise, I will update that if we end up with another
> > spin. If either you or Mark feel strongly enough on these points
> > to warrant another spin just for them just let me know.
> 
> I do have a new question triggered by the last patch from Shuming: what
> happens to the existing users of sdca_irq_populate(), do they also need
> to use the new sdca_irq_populate_early()? See my comment in the other
> patch "ASoC: rt766: add RT766/RT767 SDCA driver"
> 
> If there is no impact no need for a new spin IMHO.

Well I updated the existing user :-)

But seriously, thanks for pointing that out I missed that
patch on the list. I will go do some review.

Thanks,
Charles