From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA903F9F2A for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784549427; cv=none; b=InATmaHToJre8tGNwsdPb284yK7MONc20p/gj3cDZCn7lgXeGLwDghdUnQipnetaG+Vm/2yAHOXOvXZgTv5bVWXWGOqOb5wGTzYNsILx0tIS96Kbp7qUi1U0XkZtQ2jg1aPOOTDk9T7onQFnu9sI6HlTIjOi4r+d32MZAM3uDVE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784549427; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0ZlUemM73OrgpgXSt1vbnJWED12Mm/d6inEdp3EPcN8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pW8OFhS6B6q0VuMSeywskkEnmoWeSTNPMS8lZemBuq4Z/+SzHHxx7Q3e4jEDP93Mh+VOwmm98aUhOkrc/LPz44UeZJTzfZFFZTrdsRWBWWTHqUK76eWMRy4RfKVb1yIArff8iZEPcH+ljjmQDMjzj3YLmw/P0I6NleVLHoPiRGc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=FWVTEru5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=gD8w+7zv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FWVTEru5"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="gD8w+7zv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1784549424; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v1QUCAX7Ci9FqKXo6/kzSHEvMASwukM4IejsCu0cW4c=; b=FWVTEru5CIEyPSiduj2VQrwRGXUmep7vCW0xrNOYE4gp3rbopzW2DEzgsvb6A5s6fspfhi Liz0T/pnvGGP8Ii805W6lfl3snbXtwR7gvCHLOeAfxTtZpTlfuJCab+m9QNJ+8t8Y+Sf8F OYYYkLq5tz+BypjHKE4IeYcSOlp3EeE= Received: from mail-qv1-f71.google.com (mail-qv1-f71.google.com [209.85.219.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-193-iSSMMiAZMZmarripj7--nw-1; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 08:10:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: iSSMMiAZMZmarripj7--nw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: iSSMMiAZMZmarripj7--nw_1784549423 Received: by mail-qv1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8ea75996387so97731286d6.1 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:10:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1784549423; x=1785154223; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:content-type:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=v1QUCAX7Ci9FqKXo6/kzSHEvMASwukM4IejsCu0cW4c=; b=gD8w+7zv+80Anxf72z/Zr+NeKkH1GoGL+blewyGvK8jarmKXq4VbkbQATcdwp5DqnD IQYPETFR2wuKfyRjGLxkaifXlu0w7unir0fnu++EHPKlteFAjGPAaIImOWWhK14ekvKC uRnOL60DLM8BBYUX/9FLjsy4z/LNu3qXepz6ojX6aq+M5zxNRydml6vchaa3lboiUBCO 9TQPApNVH0p0K8/mjeRWiqTzL877e+JCFmjNgKT2luDmvJUtsEe+3TLmyr/hxUXq/9d/ D/n3RVug0cWJFuSAMppW4ZG501Hvmuifjyhw+B6kqRW6wujvRE//a+RyNG1+FvasEVLc MruA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1784549423; x=1785154223; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:content-type:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=v1QUCAX7Ci9FqKXo6/kzSHEvMASwukM4IejsCu0cW4c=; b=CPaIlJ+NbZbtx169O+DM3qOJJNE9pwfs+aJV7EPVehb4wQrYRTM3MIScfsWKywr5Ha csfusVne++AyGZVj2BFEEEbN6elhnn0wKz8D4CuOk0wdaitz8xk11pe6jUjyW5BduXb7 7Qg4HtwRXjDLDnMTwXvSZj0CQQIeDqn6sFQXYrrf08jkbRvZLVd/3LZH24IMC7SMpWTR b5nW29RUNL2YO+vsMsJmv73I26Num/SwwxmaTGH9Bp5Ke5O3jnif/eKb+BTuPUZnqrPU Q1S0ArSjBgyPXFbYuD+0pgs7uM1IjnHEL3BgrBxjIy3d9gjT+o8hs6h4vKQEKE/tpluU aqxw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RqTmlnhWAKfom/plcZryNsbGqE7XUYvktet/lzeKfMiB8tvoqV0O3TBkzsCsBNnAp1MCVKTZRfcJlBcht4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxAN/jcDhH0SUT5MNmf7Q8CHzmzq1d2WuuYkx6CKYdP4pTLQq+7 gOi0KJgbg4awBd/9flrXK0jw+/QXtMG3SsLMO7S+seIRMlxn7G9HcSOWdHVvfC21hSTIZJ4CPux xz6tjg1d58QuUhmo/+xSqGTqm1+Wl2JrcwjRphZ/ZOudau79C91EY9ox55LrDe4DQXg== X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD12vzyPnjtYdWYik6muJl0hMyMT8qR+sLimF/gq4zVuGn5ipHVM7ngdk8acAJzP IgW2d7+kNnXE/aPw6NBUQHga6pNjH9JleWXq6SJXhOGfe3a5eQJs0ZMsJGQelICjkLO8qo/wwMq D+ncMQT8+zmrgR9Trd+tM8qi8gHneZ/tRAIeuDDgJI/iNt5/tzxGwrfr6VMvz7GrqZA9PuVgxtY SvY3CZGU7K0N03LEM/Ltx0dtUp7FOhaAd4uzkSGPEs9+bPdLPKY1o8pnJw++1WgvU/gvrBQCryj AZJdh8GQZcNLfpmDup64JLU0Bjr2EC8HpdJrYDsNm2EtHm0nvnwyUqe1enqKQIxU55kMvqlicGH jEaye8Rh/5yCyCypEchmQtw6UO5wKNvVh0fg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5193:b0:8fd:6e22:c7ef with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-907784f78f4mr144894916d6.64.1784549422431; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:10:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5193:b0:8fd:6e22:c7ef with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-907784f78f4mr144894246d6.64.1784549421666; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (c-73-183-53-213.hsd1.pa.comcast.net. [73.183.53.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-907786f365fsm89080326d6.37.2026.07.20.05.10.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 08:10:19 -0400 From: Brian Masney To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig_=28The_Capable_Hub=29?= Cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: clk maintenance [Was: Re: [PATCH v1] clk: Use named initializers for platform_device_id arrays] Message-ID: References: <841cf835a24bb2f3acb99a97bb58e583220e03a2.1779963984.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.4.0 (2026-06-19) Hi Uwe, On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 07:13:11PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote: > [I trimmed recipients as the new topic isn't related only to my patch > under discussion in this thread.] > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 10:57:54AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 11:51:17AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote: > > > Do you still have it on your radar? > > > > I sent Stephen a pull on June 29th for stuff that I felt was missed during > > the last merge window and I included 4 of your patches in that pull: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/akLzCVzbMbUsgDda@redhat.com/T/#u > > > > I haven't heard from Stephen yet. There's 2-3 other pulls waiting as > > well. > > I only occasionally have clk patches, but my impression is that getting > feedback takes quite long and without Brian's efforts also things would > get lost. (Thanks Brian for picking up my stuff!) > > Looking at the current maintainers: > > $ git log --format=fuller --since 2026-01-01 next-20260717 drivers/clk | grep -E 'Boyd|Turquette' | sort | uniq -c > 8 Acked-by: Stephen Boyd > 28 Author: Stephen Boyd > 3 Cc: Michael Turquette > 3 Cc: Stephen Boyd > 81 Commit: Stephen Boyd > 1 Pull clk fix from Stephen Boyd: > 3 Pull clk updates from Stephen Boyd: > 54 Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > linux$ git log --format=oneline --since 2026-01-01 next-20260717 drivers/clk | wc -l > 453 > > (Maybe that is because Stephen cares for the core mostly and arch > maintainers merge stuff about their clks themselves?) > > The last commit where Michael Turquette was actively involved is from > 2021 (a331659e32718b31f3a304d7797a77d31610468c) which is also the last > mail from him on the clk list (see > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/?q=f%3ATurquette). > > I only observe from the side line, but with the relevance of the clk > subsystem I feel maintenance is underpowered today. > > Is it time for Michael to step down? Would Brian be ready to become a > full maintainer? Is there a need for more reviewers? Any volunteers to > step up? As Chen-Yu mentioned, I talked to Stephen about this at Linux Plumbers in person last December. I'm interested, and given the importance of the subsystem, I think we actually need even more people to help spread the load for a healthy ecosystem. Since there's a fair bit of odds and ends that get missed, I tried to start gathering things up for v7.1rc1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/abLV9vjYxXsKciHW@redhat.com/ But I never got a response outside of Andy's response. I don't know if Stephen didn't like things that were in it, or if he didn't like that I gathered up patches from other folks. I just don't know. That's why during the next merge window I just brought missing patches in the pull to Linus: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/aeeHSrZmAqE4ugXY@redhat.com/ ... and again during the last merge window: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/aj1NUYRrD30ctAbt@redhat.com/ Next week I plan to post another pull for new material posted this development cycle for things that I feel are ready, and where they won't be sent in by someone else via a different pull. I'm not trying to take anything from anyone, and I'm not trying to make anyone mad. I'm just trying to step up and help make the situation in the clk subsystem better. I'm also trying to separately address some long-standing issues in the framework: v3: clk: implement sync_state support https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20260626-clk-sync-state-v1-0-4156d8196dc8@redhat.com/ v8: clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20260327-clk-scaling-v8-0-86cd0aba3c5f@redhat.com/ I also removed the round_rate() op, which involved 200+ patches across the tree. To help with review, I also think that we should enable Sashiko reviews to the mainglist like some other subsystems currently have enabled. Brian