From: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
To: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
Cc: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drbd: reject data replies with an out-of-range payload size
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:27:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alDISEFL7wuNO_VW@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710022837.3738461-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 10:28:37PM -0400, Michael Bommarito wrote:
>recv_dless_read() receives a P_DATA_REPLY from a peer into the bio of an
>outstanding read request. The peer-supplied payload length reaches it as
>the signed int data_size, and two peer-controlled inputs can make it
>negative. With a negotiated data-integrity-alg the digest length is
>subtracted first, so a reply whose payload is smaller than the digest
>underflows data_size. With no integrity algorithm (the default) data_size
>is assigned from the unsigned h95/h100 wire length and drbdd() never
>bounds it for a payload-carrying command, so a length above INT_MAX casts
>it negative; this path needs no non-default feature. The bio receive loop
>then computes expect = min_t(int, data_size, bv_len), which is negative,
>and drbd_recv_all_warn(mapped, expect) receives with a size_t of SIZE_MAX
>into the first mapped page.
>
>The sibling receive path read_in_block() is not affected: it uses an
>unsigned size and rejects it against DRBD_MAX_BIO_SIZE before receiving.
>Reject a data reply whose size is negative after the optional digest
>subtraction, covering both triggers.
>
>Impact: a malicious or man-in-the-middle DRBD peer copies attacker-chosen
>bytes past a bio page in the receiver, corrupting kernel memory. A node
>that reads from its peer (a diskless node, or read-balancing to the peer)
>is exposed in the default configuration; data-integrity-alg is not
>required.
>
>Fixes: b411b3637fa7 ("The DRBD driver")
>Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5-5-xhigh
>Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
>Signed-off-by: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
Looks correct, thanks.
Note that DRBD usually chooses to trusts its peers by design, but I
agree that memory corruption is a bad enough consequence that we
should put the guard there regardless.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 2:28 [PATCH] drbd: reject data replies with an out-of-range payload size Michael Bommarito
2026-07-10 10:27 ` Christoph Böhmwalder [this message]
2026-07-10 15:09 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alDISEFL7wuNO_VW@localhost.localdomain \
--to=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.