From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D739BC43458 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309B310E031; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DsRnfXud"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 723D310E031 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03B6434CB; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52E3D1F000E9; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:11:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783699863; bh=lA30wsLgedj6w77Bx+yxBoIN8xuCtAuzQG9CJlT2U70=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=DsRnfXudcKFG4tE3uLg5wp1FQDvtvaP3zis21eWpWJzIuBaUs7jUvRkYx9yaT5Nna Uke3TnMF3NN03Cv+ZeGpduZL8MSUkx+2KHq7Eao/ytUWaT9krXEoRRphWk5hwsn5mS +oOnjNZHoG6Sw9sCadD2KogeNj1XuoZFS0ZzWZvIZxoSRRpvLBBnvQlffy5clryzmG +JedC5YhTSJb3G2zpE4wLJZ1JvqbOmNHDFzVFAuE9LzV8lHXIuLi31mnvf2VMZdEM8 m5PEKw8EoFLP0Y2xha99VDIzTd5ef8Zf9ZKcrs55tMyBIhxf9M5/0JU541HdYeARb2 fU+d+27YLEATA== Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 06:11:02 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: phasta@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Boris Brezillon , Steven Price , Liviu Dudau , Chia-I Wu , Danilo Krummrich , Matthew Brost , kernel-dev@igalia.com Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] DRM scheduler kthread_worker for submission latency improvements Message-ID: References: <20260702143745.79293-1-tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com> <4eb23476ff56bee108578adfe131be38e8fc1476.camel@mailbox.org> <19f0c3fe-7395-492f-b016-7a7a507da4f6@igalia.com> <250bfc53-e91b-4c48-9401-bbe636d3400b@igalia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <250bfc53-e91b-4c48-9401-bbe636d3400b@igalia.com> X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 01:29:19PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > So the question is whether something like this is acceptable to workqueue > core? If so, I can send it as a proper RFC and go from there. Yes, that looks like enough data. Let's add RT support. Thanks. -- tejun