From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf test: Update test for --for-each-cgroup option
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:59:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alGHTR25xLliMEUJ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710235200.CD3001F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 11:52:00PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] The `check_evlist_expand()` test fails to exercise the bug it intends to verify because it specifies `-e cpu-clock`.
> - [Medium] Bash pipeline semantics mask `perf stat` command failures, potentially causing false test passes.
> --
>
> --- Patch [4]: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf test: Update test for --for-each-cgroup option ---
> commit b42b21fdf494fb61acde3f563ac29e9b49df9327
> Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> perf test: Update test for --for-each-cgroup option
>
> This commit updates the stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh test to simply check the
> number of output lines with and without the --for-each-cgroup option.
>
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh
> > index ff2e06c408bc6..17b17b112169c 100755
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -58,9 +58,24 @@ check_system_wide_counted()
> > fi
> > }
> >
> > +# Missing flags in evlist__clone() resulted in different output.
> > +# Just check the number of output lines for simple verification.
> > +check_evlist_expand()
> > +{
> > + normal_output=$(perf stat -a -e cpu-clock -x, true 2>&1 | wc -l)
> > + expand_output=$(perf stat -a -e cpu-clock -x, --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup / true 2>&1 | wc -l)
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Will this actually test the bug with evlist__clone() missing flags?
>
> By specifying -e cpu-clock, the loading of default events is disabled,
> meaning default_metricgroup and default_show_events are false. This prevents
> the duplication bug from occurring during evsel__clone(), rendering the test
> ineffective at catching the regression it was meant to verify.
Oops, that's right. It should have this on top.
Thanks,
Namhyung
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh
index 17b17b112169c8ba..febe3af0644157f3 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ check_system_wide_counted()
# Just check the number of output lines for simple verification.
check_evlist_expand()
{
- normal_output=$(perf stat -a -e cpu-clock -x, true 2>&1 | wc -l)
- expand_output=$(perf stat -a -e cpu-clock -x, --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup / true 2>&1 | wc -l)
+ normal_output=$(perf stat -a -x, true 2>&1 | wc -l)
+ expand_output=$(perf stat -a -x, --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup / true 2>&1 | wc -l)
if [ "${normal_output}" != "${expand_output}" ]; then
if [ "${verbose}" = "1" ]; then
echo "Normal output has ${normal_output} lines, but it now has ${expand_output}"
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 23:41 [PATCH v2 1/4] perf stat: Fix duplicate output with --for-each-cgroup Namhyung Kim
2026-07-10 23:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf evsel: Remove unused BPF related fields Namhyung Kim
2026-07-10 23:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf evsel: Arrange some fields that should be cloned Namhyung Kim
2026-07-10 23:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf test: Update test for --for-each-cgroup option Namhyung Kim
2026-07-10 23:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 23:59 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alGHTR25xLliMEUJ@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.