From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] x86/pci: move Intel chipset quirks to arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 12:33:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alNtgEIG1b-bdyFF@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alNp9GFvMDN7yDQ3@wunner.de>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2026 at 12:18:28PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> However, I vaguely remember that some Intel chipsets of that day were
> paired with DEC Alpha. Triton maybe?
Okay it was AMD Irongate (751/761) which was compatible with both
Athlon and Alpha 21264 because they shared the EV6 bus protocol:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socket_A#Chipsets
But Irongate was paired with a VIA VT82C686B southbridge according
to Wikipedia, and in patch [3/8] of this series you're moving
quirk_vt82c686_acpi() to arch/x86. That doesn't look right.
Moral of the story is, I'd be very cautious about assumptions
that these chipsets were all x86-only.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-12 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 22:17 [PATCH 0/8] x86/pci: consolidate x86-specific PCI quirks into arch/x86/pci/fixup.c Rosen Penev
2026-07-07 22:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/pci: gate arch fixups with CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS Rosen Penev
2026-07-07 22:17 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/pci: move Intel chipset quirks to arch/x86/pci/fixup.c Rosen Penev
2026-07-12 10:18 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-07-12 10:33 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2026-07-07 22:17 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/pci: move VIA " Rosen Penev
2026-07-07 22:17 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/pci: move SiS " Rosen Penev
2026-07-07 22:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/pci: move ALi " Rosen Penev
2026-07-07 22:17 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/pci: move AMD x86 " Rosen Penev
2026-07-07 22:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/pci: move x86 ifdef-gated " Rosen Penev
2026-07-07 22:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/pci: move remaining x86-specific quirks to fixup.c Rosen Penev
2026-07-10 20:46 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86/pci: consolidate x86-specific PCI quirks into arch/x86/pci/fixup.c Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-10 20:51 ` Rosen Penev
2026-07-10 21:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alNtgEIG1b-bdyFF@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.