From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>,
Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
Naveen Kumar Chaudhary <naveen.osdev@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] printk: Handle pre-enabled consoles in the top-level register_console()
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:43:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alecraCbhh_W4ZtF@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87qzl5bsqu.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
On Tue 2026-07-14 15:39:45, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2026-06-04, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> > The function try_enable_preferred_console() currently has the
> > non-obvious side effect of returning success for consoles that are
> > already pre-enabled. This obscures the logic flow during console
> > registration.
> >
> > Move the check for pre-enabled consoles directly into the top-level
> > register_console(). This change makes the handling of pre-enabled
> > consoles explicit and easier to follow.
> >
> > Furthermore, this separation lays the groundwork for future cleanups
> > where try_enable_preferred_console() can be restricted to cases where
> > an entry actually exists in the console_cmdline[] array.
> >
> > Also it fixes a possible out-of-bound access when the console_cmdline[]
> > array is full and no console matched. In fact, the check of
> > c->user_specified did not make much sense. The new console either
> > matched and was handled in the for-cycle. Or it did not match
> > and then *c pointed to an unused entry.
> >
> > Possible behavior change:
> >
> > try_enable_preferred_console() will newly be called also with
> > @user_specified parameter set to "false" when it failed with the "true"
> > variant. But it looks like the right way to do. It will allow to call
> > newcon->setup() when the console was preferred by some platform
> > specific code.
>
> I agree that it is the right way to do it. But I am a bit confused about
> the pre-enabled consoles.
You are not alone ;-)
> I understood it that a driver manually sets CON_ENABLED because that
> console is not enabled via normal methods ("console=" or "stdout" in
> device-tree). There are several examples of this (netconsole, pstore,
> nfcon, kgdb).
My understanding is that these set CON_ENABLED because they
are enabled another way, e.g. netconsole=, ramoops, ...
And console_cmdline was originally only for consoles defined
via the console= parameter, ... And it probably does not make
sense to add a fake entry into console_cmdline[] array just
to make sure that the console driver would match something.
> - drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c
> - drivers/tty/serial/ma35d1_serial.c
> - drivers/tty/serial/mux.c
My expectation is that these are some special platforms where the
authors just wanted them enabled out-of-box.
BTW, similar situation is also in handling SPCR on different
architectures. I have investigated it some time ago and found
the following. The console proposed by SPCR is:
+ ignored on "loongarch" architecture.
+ requested on "x86" when "acpi=spcr" is defined on the command line,
otherwise ignored.
+ requested on "arm" architecture unless "acpi=nospcr" is defined on
the command line.
+ requested on "riscv" architecture unless acpi is disabled
So, again, some architectures get a particular console preferred
by the particular HW by default. Others get the kernel default
which is typically a graphical ttyX.
> that are also setting CON_ENABLED, but seem that they should be
> specified in the normal way.
>
> Are these drivers falsely setting CON_ENABLED? Is there a clear
> description about when a driver should manually set CON_ENABLED?
I think that it is intentional. And Marcos is working on some
clean up to remove the hack with CON_ENABLED completely, see
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251227-printk-cleanup-part3-v1-0-21a291bcf197@suse.com/
> > Reported-by: Naveen Kumar Chaudhary <naveen.osdev@gmail.com> # out-of-bound access
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7sq4tr2nmlz32tvkf6vpsghv6exvqfghsrlvywjcqihzsqqbf7@bspclmti5xg4
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
>
> Despite my open questions about CON_ENABLED, this patch is simplifying
> the pre-enabled path and correctly specifying the possible behavior
> change.
>
> Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Thanks for review.
I am going to queue this patch for 7.3. I prevents a rather
theoretical out-of-bound access to console_cmdline array,
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 10:14 [PATCH v4 00/11] printk: Clean up preferred console handling Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] printk: Handle pre-enabled consoles in the top-level register_console() Petr Mladek
2026-07-14 13:33 ` John Ogness
2026-07-15 14:43 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] printk: Rename struct console_cmdline to preferred_console Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] printk: Rename preferred_console to preferred_dev_console Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] printk: Separate code for adding/updating preferred console metadata Petr Mladek
2026-07-14 14:35 ` John Ogness
2026-07-15 15:52 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] printk: Cleanup _braille_(un)register_console() wrappers Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] console/braille: Lock console->setup() call during the registration Petr Mladek
2026-07-15 14:41 ` John Ogness
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] printk: Separate code for enabling console Petr Mladek
2026-07-15 16:01 ` John Ogness
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] printk: Try to register each console as Braille first Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] printk: Do not set Braille console as preferred_console Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] printk: Modify try_enable_default_console() to return error/success Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] printk: Try enable preferred consoles only when there are any Petr Mladek
2026-07-14 8:42 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] printk: Clean up preferred console handling Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alecraCbhh_W4ZtF@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpdesouza@suse.com \
--cc=naveen.osdev@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.