From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com,
sashiko-bot@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] panic: fix redirect CPU race in panic_try_force_cpu()
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:22:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpI019MV7idCZ1O@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714173103.11585-2-include@grrlz.net>
On Tue 2026-07-14 17:31:00, Bradley Morgan wrote:
> The cmpxchg() in panic_try_force_cpu() makes sure that only one CPU
> tries to redirect panic() to the requested CPU. It is similar to the
> cmpxchg() in panic_try_start() which makes sure that only one CPU does
> the panic(). In both situations, only the winner of cmpxchg() should
> proceed further. Other CPUs should go offline.
>
> There is a bug because the cmpxchg loser returns false and falls through
> into vpanic(). Two non-target CPUs A and B panic, the requested CPU is C:
>
> cpu A cpu B
> ---------- ----------
> panic() panic()
> vpanic() vpanic()
> panic_try_force_cpu() panic_try_force_cpu()
> cmpxchg wins cmpxchg fails
> redirect = A old_cpu = A
> IPI -> C return false <- BUG
> return true panic_try_start() wins
> panic_smp_self_stop() __crash_kexec() on B
> (A stops) (target C bypassed)
>
> The loser must stop, not fall through. It cannot just return true,
> though. A CPU that already won the redirect cmpxchg can reenter
> panic_try_force_cpu() on the same CPU, for example a nested NMI during
> the message formatting, before the IPI is sent:
>
> cpu A (1st) cpu A (nested)
> ---------- ----------
> panic()
> vpanic()
> panic_try_force_cpu()
> cmpxchg wins (redirect = A)
> vsnprintf(msg) ...
> <-- NMI, nested panic -->
> panic()
> vpanic()
> panic_try_force_cpu()
> cmpxchg fails
> old_cpu == A (this CPU)
> return true <- would halt
> panic_smp_self_stop()
> (IPI never sent, panic abandoned)
>
> Check old_cpu against this_cpu so a second call from the same CPU
> returns false and falls through to panic_try_start() instead.
>
> Also fix the panic_in_progress() check. We must not redirect when
> panic_cpu is already assigned. Return true to stop when the panic is on
> another CPU, false to proceed when it is this one.
>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260705164123.18746-1-include@grrlz.net
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707172252.4842-1-include@grrlz.net
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -396,16 +396,20 @@ static bool panic_try_force_cpu(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> return false;
> }
>
> - /* Another panic already in progress */
> + /*
> + * Don't redirect when a panic is already in progress. Stop this
> + * CPU when it's another one, proceed when it's this one.
> + */
> if (panic_in_progress())
> - return false;
> + return !panic_on_this_cpu();
Nit: I would use
return panic_on_other_cpu();
It is more straightforward. The negative logic just added an extra
step for understanding the code.
Otherwise, it looks good to me.
With the proposed change:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 17:30 [PATCH v4 0/3] panic: fix the panic_force_cpu redirect races Bradley Morgan
2026-07-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] panic: fix redirect CPU race in panic_try_force_cpu() Bradley Morgan
2026-07-17 15:22 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-07-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] panic: flatten nmi_panic control flow Bradley Morgan
2026-07-17 15:16 ` Petr Mladek
2026-07-17 15:20 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-07-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] panic: allow force_cpu redirect from an NMI Bradley Morgan
2026-07-17 15:44 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpI019MV7idCZ1O@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=include@grrlz.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.