From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: julia.lawall@lip6.fr (Julia Lawall)
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 17:16:08 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [Cocci] How to exclude volatile data accesses in expressions
 with SmPL?
In-Reply-To: <5342BF46.8030405@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402212321410.2043@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <53342A9C.9070406@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1403271907390.2088@hadrien>
 <5334705A.9050303@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1403271942390.2088@hadrien>
 <5342BF46.8030405@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404071715180.2187@hadrien>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr



On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> > Coccinelle makes an effort to infer types.  YOu may need to use eg
> > --recursive-includes and --relax-include-path to get the most possible
> > type information.
>
> How do you think about to make it possible to check attributes for expressions
> in SmPL constraints?

I tried to do this at one point, but it introduced a lot of parsing
problems, because attributes can appear in a variety of places.  The
benefit didn't seem to be worth the risk.

julia